Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.
Tell us about your business, current payment setup and what you're looking to change. We'll use it to understand your requirements before identifying providers that may be suitable.
Losing a merchant account can stop a business taking card payments with very little warning.
However, not every termination means the same thing.
A payment provider may close an account because it no longer supports the merchant’s sector, because transaction activity has changed or because the business has breached the terms under which it was approved.
More serious cases may involve:
Excessive chargebacks
Fraud concerns
Card-scheme monitoring
Undisclosed products or services
Prohibited transactions
Failure to complete compliance checks
A data-security incident
Suspected illegal activity
A Mastercard MATCH Pro or Visa VMSS listing
The reason matters because it determines whether another provider is likely to consider the business, what evidence will be required and whether the underlying problem must be resolved before a new application is submitted.
This guide explains what to do when a merchant account is suspended or terminated, how industry termination records work and how to approach replacement payment processing without making the situation worse.
Merchant Advice Service helps businesses understand what potential replacement providers are likely to examine following an account closure.
This may include merchants that:
Have received notice of termination
Have had processing suspended immediately
Are unable to access settlements
Have been asked to provide additional compliance information
Have exceeded expected volumes
Have experienced increasing chargebacks
Have been moved into a higher-risk category
Need a provider that supports their actual sector
Have discovered that their original application was incomplete
Are unsure whether they have been placed on an industry termination database
MAS cannot overturn a provider’s decision, guarantee replacement processing or remove a card-scheme listing.
Where a potential route exists, MAS may help the business understand its requirements and identify providers willing to consider the circumstances. I
f the business needs replacement processing, it is useful to understand how the events leading to termination may affect future underwriting. Read High-Risk vs Low-Risk Merchant Accounts for the wider factors providers use when assessing merchant risk.
Quick answer: Can you obtain a new merchant account after termination?
Sometimes.
A merchant account termination does not automatically prevent a business from obtaining another account.
The likelihood of replacement processing depends on:
Why the account was closed
Whether the termination was commercial or compliance-related
Whether the business has been reported to an industry database
The merchant’s chargeback and fraud history
Whether funds are being withheld
Whether the underlying issue has been corrected
The sector and products involved
Whether the business model is legal and properly disclosed
How openly the termination is explained in the new application
A provider leaving a particular sector is very different from an account being closed for suspected fraud.
The first may require a better provider match. The second may prevent another acquirer from accepting the business until the matter has been investigated or resolved.
A terminated merchant account is a card-acquiring facility that has been ended by the acquiring bank, payment service provider or payment facilitator.
The termination can affect the merchant’s ability to:
Authorise new card payments
Capture previously authorised transactions
Receive settlements
Issue card refunds
Access stored payment credentials
Use card terminals
Use a virtual terminal
Access the provider’s dispute portal
Collect recurring payments
Process through connected gateways
The exact effect depends on which part of the payment arrangement has been terminated.
For example, a merchant may have:
An acquiring agreement
A separate payment gateway
Card terminals supplied by another company
A payment facilitator account
A fraud-screening platform
Stored card tokens
A business bank account
The closure of one service does not necessarily close every other service, but it may make them unusable.
These terms are sometimes used interchangeably, but they can mean different things.
The provider is investigating the merchant or its transaction activity.
Processing may continue, be limited or be temporarily paused.
The provider may request:
Updated company documents
Processing statements
Customer invoices
Delivery evidence
Supplier contracts
Licences
Source-of-funds information
Chargeback explanations
Website changes
Details of new products or markets
A review does not necessarily mean the account will be closed.
The merchant is temporarily unable to process some or all transactions.
A suspension may occur while the provider investigates:
Suspected fraud
A sudden increase in transaction volume
Unusual transaction patterns
A data-security concern
Regulatory questions
Incomplete customer due diligence
The provider may reinstate the account, impose new restrictions or move to termination.
The provider informs the merchant that the agreement will end on a future date.
The business may be able to continue processing during the notice period, although limits or reserve requirements may change.
Processing stops immediately or within a very short period.
This is more likely where the provider believes there is a serious risk, legal restriction, card-scheme obligation or breach of contract.
The provider may be unable to give the merchant complete information where doing so would conflict with financial-crime or other legal obligations.
Where a merchant account has been terminated, it is important to understand whether the cause was merchant performance, a contractual issue or simply a change in the provider’s appetite. Our Payment Provider Risk Appetite guide explains how provider acceptance policies can change and why this matters when approaching another acquirer.
Is a merchant account the same as a business bank account?
No.
A merchant account is used to process and settle card payments. A business bank account holds the company’s money and supports ordinary banking transactions.
A company can lose:
Its merchant account but retain its bank account
Its bank account but retain its acquiring agreement temporarily
Both services at the same time
A payment-facilitator account without losing its wider banking relationship
The steps required following closure depend on which service has been affected.
The term “debanking” is sometimes used broadly, but a terminated acquiring agreement should be assessed separately from the closure of a current account.
There is no single termination reason.
Understanding the actual cause is the most important part of finding a suitable next step.
Payment providers regularly review the sectors, countries and business models they support.
A provider may stop accepting:
High-value future-delivery businesses
Particular countries
Certain regulated products
The merchant may have traded properly and remained within its agreed terms but no longer fit the provider’s commercial appetite.
This type of termination may be easier to explain to another acquirer, provided the business has a clean processing history.
A merchant may have been accepted under a business description that did not accurately reflect its real activity.
Examples include:
A travel business boarded as general retail
A subscription company boarded for one-off sales
A marketplace boarded as an ordinary ecommerce merchant
A prize-competition business boarded without disclosing the competition model
A furniture seller failing to disclose long delivery times
A financial service using a general consulting description
A merchant accepting telephone payments through an online-only account
The original error may have come from:
The merchant
A sales agent
A broker
An incomplete application
The provider’s onboarding process
The business changing after approval
A replacement application should describe the business accurately, even if the original account did not.
Providers underwrite the business based on the information available when the account is opened.
A change may become material where the merchant introduces:
New products
New countries
Higher transaction values
Subscription payments
Telephone orders
Longer delivery periods
A different website
A second trading name
A new licence
A marketplace model
Third-party sellers
New currencies
A significant increase in volume
A legitimate change can still create a termination risk if the provider was not told about it.
Merchant applications usually include expected:
Monthly turnover
Annual turnover
Average transaction value
Maximum transaction value
Refund rate
Chargeback rate
Sales-channel split
Sudden growth can be commercially positive but create additional exposure for the acquirer.
For example, the provider may be concerned if a business approved for £20,000 per month begins processing £200,000 without prior discussion.
The concern may be greater where products or services will not be delivered until a future date.
A high level of customer disputes can lead to:
Increased monitoring
Additional fees
A rolling reserve
Delayed settlement
Processing limits
Card-scheme programme entry
Termination
The provider will normally examine more than the overall ratio.
It may consider:
Chargeback value
Reason codes
Fraud reports
Customer countries
Sales channels
Whether disputes are increasing
Whether the merchant responds in time
Whether corrective action has worked
A merchant that changes provider without correcting the cause of its disputes may experience another termination.
The provider may close an account where transaction activity suggests:
Stolen-card use
Account takeover
Card testing
Merchant collusion
Transaction laundering
Fake or undelivered goods
Misleading subscriptions
Scam activity
Processing on behalf of another business
First-party misuse
Money laundering
Mastercard now operates MATCH Pro, a system through which financial institutions can share information about merchants terminated in qualifying fraud-related circumstances and consult that information when assessing a new merchant.
A legitimate merchant can also trigger a risk review through unusual activity. This is why organised evidence and a clear explanation of the business model are important.
Providers maintain prohibited and restricted-business lists.
An account may be terminated if a merchant begins accepting payments for products that were not approved.
Examples can include:
Unlicensed gambling
Certain financial products
Illegal or controlled goods
Unsupported pharmaceuticals
Misleading investment products
Sanctioned activity
Unapproved adult content
Transaction laundering
Third-party payment processing
Changing the wording on a website does not resolve a prohibited-activity problem where the underlying transactions remain the same.
Providers must maintain current information about the businesses they serve.
A merchant may be asked to provide:
Director identification
Ownership information
Updated company documents
Bank statements
Licences
Proof of address
Source-of-funds evidence
Supplier information
Transaction records
Website details
Failure to respond may lead to restrictions or termination, even where the original business is legitimate.
Where a provider cannot complete required customer due diligence, financial-crime rules may prevent it from continuing the relationship.
A merchant may be restricted or terminated following:
A suspected card-data breach
Failure to complete required PCI validation
Storage of card data in an insecure system
Use of an unapproved payment process
Compromised terminals
Malware
Repeated security failures
The business may need specialist data-security assistance before another provider will accept it.
An acquirer may remain exposed to future:
Chargebacks
Refunds
Undelivered orders
Subscription liabilities
Customer claims
The provider may become concerned where a merchant:
Has deteriorating finances
Cannot fund refunds
Has overdue debts
Enters an insolvency process
Builds a large value of undelivered orders
Relies on one failing supplier
Experiences a sudden increase in cancellations
Termination may be accompanied by withheld settlements or an increased reserve.
An account may be terminated for reasons unrelated to the individual merchant.
For example:
The provider exits the UK
The acquiring sponsor changes
A payment facilitator loses a banking relationship
A product is withdrawn
The provider stops supporting a sector
The gateway and acquirer end their commercial arrangement
The termination letter and provider communications should be retained, as they may help demonstrate that the closure was not caused by merchant misconduct.
The phrase “terminated merchant account” covers several very different situations.
Merchant Advice Service commonly sees merchants approach replacement providers before they have established:
Which company actually terminated the service
Whether the gateway or acquiring account was closed
Whether the termination was commercial or for cause
Whether funds have been retained
Whether a card-scheme report has been made
Whether the provider still allows refunds
Whether recurring payment credentials remain available
Whether chargebacks still need to be managed
Whether the original business description was accurate
This creates avoidable problems.
A new provider will assess a merchant differently depending on whether:
The old provider stopped supporting the sector
The account exceeded agreed volume
Chargebacks increased
The merchant failed to supply information
The business model was incorrectly described
The merchant was terminated for suspected fraud
MATCH Pro or VMSS information is present
The safest approach is to identify the category first, correct what can be corrected and then approach providers whose appetite matches the full circumstances.
Keep copies of:
The termination notice
Emails from the provider
Portal messages
Merchant statements
The original application
The merchant agreement
Chargeback reports
Fraud reports
Settlement reports
Reserve information
Compliance requests
Previous complaints
Website screenshots
Provider portals may become inaccessible after closure.
Export important information while access remains available.
Ask whether the termination affects:
All merchant IDs
One website or trading name
Card-present payments
Ecommerce payments
Telephone payments
Recurring payments
Refunds
Payouts
The payment gateway
Card terminals
Stored payment credentials
Connected businesses
Do not assume that every part of the payment system has the same closure date.
Confirm:
When new authorisations will stop
Whether existing authorisations can be captured
Whether recurring payments will continue
Whether refunds can still be issued
When portal access will end
When terminals must be returned
Whether the gateway remains active
How open chargebacks will be handled
Request a clear explanation of the termination where the provider is able to give one.
Useful questions include:
Was the termination commercial or for cause?
Which contract clause is being relied upon?
Was a particular transaction pattern involved?
Was the business placed into a card-scheme monitoring programme?
Was any report made to MATCH Pro or VMSS?
Can the issue be remediated?
Is an internal appeal available?
Who handles complaints?
The provider may not be able to disclose certain financial-crime information.
Ask for a written breakdown of:
Unsettled transactions
Rolling reserves
Fixed reserves
Chargeback deductions
Refund deductions
Security deposits
Other withheld funds
Expected release dates
Conditions affecting release
The provider’s right to retain or debit funds will normally be governed by the merchant agreement and the financial exposure remaining after closure.
The Financial Ombudsman considers merchant complaints involving withheld funds, chargebacks and merchant-acquiring agreements where the business and complaint fall within its jurisdiction.
Ask how refunds will be processed after termination.
Do not send a refund by bank transfer without confirming how the original card transaction and any later chargeback will be handled.
Otherwise, the business could:
Refund the customer by bank transfer
Receive a chargeback for the original card payment
Pay the same customer twice
Keep records linking every manual refund to the original transaction and customer agreement.
Open disputes may continue after new payment acceptance has stopped.
Retain:
Transaction identifiers
Authorisation data
3D Secure results
Customer orders
Delivery records
Subscription consent
Communications
Refund evidence
Chargeback deadlines
Termination does not necessarily remove liability for disputes arising from transactions processed before closure.
Depending on the business, temporary options might include:
Bank transfer
Invoicing
An existing approved secondary acquirer
Cash or card-present alternatives
Pausing new orders
Contacting customers with outstanding balances
Do not process through another company’s merchant account or hide transactions inside a different business.
That can be treated as transaction laundering and create much more serious consequences.
Not always.
A rapid application may be appropriate where:
The old provider has left the sector
The provider has closed a product
The business has a clean processing record
The termination is clearly unrelated to misconduct
The replacement provider understands the full business model
It may be better to pause where:
The reason is unclear
Fraud is alleged
Chargebacks are uncontrolled
MATCH Pro or VMSS may be involved
The business model was incorrectly disclosed
A licence has expired
The website contains non-compliant claims
The company cannot fund refunds
Compliance information is incomplete
The merchant is still investigating a data breach
Submitting the same incomplete application to several providers can create inconsistent records and additional declines.
A terminated merchant account can change the way a future acquiring bank assesses an application, particularly where processing history, chargebacks or previous provider concerns are involved. See our High-Risk Merchant Accounts guide for a wider explanation of specialist underwriting and provider appetite.
Why applying everywhere can cause problems
Urgency often leads merchants to apply to every provider they can find.
This can create:
Inconsistent descriptions of the business
Different turnover figures
Multiple credit or risk enquiries
Repeated MATCH Pro or VMSS checks
Conflicting explanations of termination
Applications to providers with no relevant appetite
Pressure to hide the previous closure
Expensive emergency contracts
Further terminations
A provider may view inconsistent information as a compliance concern even where the underlying business is legitimate.
One complete and accurate application is more useful than several rushed applications.
The current Mastercard system is called MATCH Pro, although merchants and payment businesses still commonly use the terms:
MATCH
MATCH list
Terminated Merchant File
TMF
MATCH Pro allows financial institutions to record and consult information about merchants terminated in qualifying circumstances.
Mastercard explains that information may include:
The merchant’s identity
Trading information
Website information
Merchant category code
Contract and termination dates
The reason code
Details relating to principal owners
Financial institutions can consult this information when deciding whether to onboard a new merchant.
No.
An ordinary commercial closure does not automatically mean that the merchant has been listed.
A merchant might not be listed where:
The provider stops serving a sector
The provider exits a market
The account is closed for low usage
The parties end the agreement commercially
The provider’s product is withdrawn
Listing depends on whether the circumstances meet the relevant Mastercard criteria.
Merchants should not assume they are listed simply because a salesperson or automated decline refers vaguely to “blacklisting”.
Ask the terminating provider directly.
Visa operates the Visa Merchant Screening Service, or VMSS.
VMSS includes a terminated-listing database used by acquirers during merchant due diligence.
Visa states that acquirers must:
Add a terminated merchant, sponsored merchant or relevant third-party agent where the VMSS listing criteria are met
Query the terminated-listing database before onboarding a prospective merchant
The service allows acquirers to identify whether a merchant has been terminated by another acquirer and review available termination information.
Visa says acquirers can search for qualifying terminations recorded during the preceding five years.
No.
MATCH Pro is operated by Mastercard. VMSS is operated by Visa.
Both support merchant due diligence and allow qualifying termination information to affect future underwriting.
A merchant may:
Appear in one system
Appear in both
Appear in neither
Have different information recorded by different acquirers
The business should ask the terminating provider what has been reported rather than assuming that one database covers every scheme.
Removal is not usually achieved by simply paying a third-party “blacklist removal” company.
The first step is to identify:
Whether a listing exists
Which acquirer submitted it
The recorded termination reason
Whether the information is accurate
Whether the listing meets scheme criteria
Mastercard states that the financial institutions contributing information are responsible for adding and maintaining it and ensuring the accuracy of the merchant’s personal information. Merchants are directed to the relevant financial institution for privacy and data enquiries.
Visa’s VMSS process allows the acquirer that entered a termination listing to modify or delete its own record.
This means the merchant will normally need to raise the issue with the provider or acquirer responsible for the entry.
Possible grounds for challenge may include:
The merchant was incorrectly identified
Company details are wrong
Owner information is wrong
The recorded reason is inaccurate
The listing criteria were not met
The entry should have been updated following an investigation
A genuine and accurate listing may not be removed simply because it makes obtaining another account difficult.
Be cautious of anyone guaranteeing removal without first reviewing the provider’s evidence and the scheme criteria.
It may be difficult.
A listing does not necessarily operate as a legal ban on accepting card payments, but it can materially affect an acquirer’s risk decision.
Some providers will automatically decline certain listings. Others may assess limited categories on a case-by-case basis.
The result can depend on:
The reason for the listing
How long ago the event occurred
The corrective action taken
The current owners and directors
The business model
Financial strength
Chargeback history
Whether the original provider supports the explanation
The new acquirer’s policy
A provider willing to consider the case may require:
Higher fees
A reserve
Delayed settlement
Processing limits
More frequent monitoring
Additional documents
No broker or adviser can guarantee acceptance.
Creating a new company does not automatically remove the effect of a previous termination.
Providers may examine connections involving:
Directors
Shareholders
Ultimate beneficial owners
Addresses
Websites
Phone numbers
Bank accounts
Trading names
Products
Previous merchant IDs
Associated companies
MATCH Pro information can include details relating to principal owners as well as the merchant business.
A new legal entity used to conceal the same owners and activity can create further compliance concerns.
A genuine restructuring should be disclosed and explained.
No legitimate provider should advise a merchant to process through:
A friend’s company
A related company that has not disclosed the activity
A supplier’s account
A director’s unrelated business
Another website’s merchant ID
The merchant name, products, website and transaction activity should match the business approved by the acquirer.
Processing one business’s transactions through another merchant account may constitute transaction laundering and can lead to additional terminations, withheld funds and card-scheme action.
It may.
The provider can remain exposed to:
Chargebacks
Refunds
Fraud losses
Undelivered goods
Subscription liabilities
Card-scheme assessments
The merchant agreement may allow it to:
Hold unsettled transactions
Retain a reserve
Increase a reserve
Delay release
Deduct chargebacks
Offset other liabilities
The business should request a written schedule showing:
Total funds retained
Reason for retention
Contractual basis
Expected review date
Earliest release date
Possible deductions
Contact details for queries
A replacement provider will also want to understand why funds are being held.
New UK rules apply to certain payment-service framework contracts entered into on or after 28 April 2026.
For relevant contracts without a fixed expiry date, the changes include:
Increasing the standard termination-notice period to 90 days
Requiring sufficiently detailed and specific reasons
Informing eligible customers about potential Financial Ombudsman rights
The rules include exceptions, including situations involving financial-crime obligations or where providing information would be unlawful. They do not mean every merchant must always receive 90 days’ continued processing.
Whether these protections apply can depend on:
The contract date
The type of payment service
The contract terms
The size and status of the business
Any applicable corporate opt-out
The reason for termination
Legal or scheme obligations
A merchant should obtain legal advice where the notice period or termination rights are disputed.
Potentially.
The first step is normally to use the provider’s formal complaints process.
The complaint should explain:
What happened
The date processing was restricted or terminated
Why the merchant believes the decision or process was unfair
The effect on the business
The information already provided
The outcome requested
The merchant can ask the provider to:
Explain the contractual basis
Review factual errors
Confirm retained funds
Correct inaccurate records
Reconsider an industry listing
Provide its final response
Eligible small businesses may be able to take a complaint about a UK financial services provider to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
The Ombudsman says it can consider merchant-card-service complaints involving withheld funds, chargebacks, merchant-acquiring agreements and card-reader services.
Its small-business eligibility generally includes businesses with annual turnover below £6.5 million and either fewer than 50 employees or a balance-sheet total below £5 million, subject to its complete eligibility rules.
A complaint does not automatically require the provider to reopen the account, and the Ombudsman will consider the merchant agreement and the circumstances of the closure.
A replacement provider may request more information than the original provider did.
Prepare:
Termination letter
Effective date
Reason given
Contract clause
Details of any appeal
Complaint correspondence
Confirmation of any MATCH Pro or VMSS entry
Information about withheld funds
At least several recent merchant statements where available
Monthly turnover
Average transaction value
Maximum transaction value
Refund rate
Chargeback rate
Fraud rate
Sales-channel split
Customer countries
Company registration details
Ownership structure
Director identification
Bank statements
Management accounts
Licences
Supplier agreements
Websites and trading names
Depending on the termination reason, this could include:
Revised customer terms
Improved billing descriptors
Fraud-rule changes
New delivery evidence
Chargeback procedures
Compliance policies
Staff training
Website corrections
New licences
Security-assessment results
Reduced delivery times
Proof that unsupported products were removed
A clear application should explain both what happened and what has changed.
The explanation should be factual and concise.
A useful structure is:
State:
Which provider terminated the account
When notice was received
When processing stopped
The reason given
Explain:
The relevant business or transaction circumstances
Whether the merchant agrees with the provider
Any contributing factors
Describe:
Corrective action
New controls
Website changes
Reduced chargebacks
Compliance improvements
Management changes
New suppliers
Financial strengthening
List:
Statements
Reports
Correspondence
Policies
Financial records
Independent assessments
Avoid:
Blaming every other party
Minimising material facts
Claiming there was no reason when correspondence says otherwise
Omitting previous declines
Changing the explanation between applications
An underwriter does not expect every merchant to have a perfect history. It does expect the application to be truthful and internally consistent.
There is no reliable universal timeframe.
A straightforward commercial termination may be assessed relatively quickly where:
The business is established
Processing history is clean
The website is ready
Documents are complete
The provider already accepts the sector
A complex application may take longer where:
MATCH Pro or VMSS information exists
Chargebacks are high
Funds are being held
Several legal entities are involved
The business is regulated
The merchant operates internationally
Previous information was inaccurate
A compliance investigation remains open
A promise of “guaranteed same-day approval” should be treated cautiously.
The goal should be stable, correctly underwritten processing rather than the fastest possible temporary account.
A properly disclosed secondary acquiring route can reduce operational dependence on one provider.
It may be appropriate for businesses that:
Depend heavily on online card payments
Process high monthly volumes
Serve several countries
Use multiple currencies
Have different brands or legal entities
Need operational resilience
It should not be used to:
Conceal chargebacks
Avoid volume limits
Split suspicious activity
Continue processing prohibited transactions
Bypass a scheme listing
Hide termination from another provider
Both providers should understand the business and the role each arrangement performs.
Before accepting a replacement account, ask:
Does the provider knowingly support the exact business activity?
Has the previous termination been fully disclosed?
Does the provider need the old termination letter?
How will any MATCH Pro or VMSS information be treated?
What products and countries are permitted?
What monthly volume has been approved?
What are the maximum transaction values?
Are online, telephone and recurring payments supported?
Is a reserve required?
How long will reserve funds be held?
What are the settlement times?
What chargeback limits apply?
What fraud tools are required?
What changes must be reported?
Can the provider suspend processing immediately?
What notice provisions apply?
How will funds be handled after closure?
Can refunds continue following termination?
Who owns stored payment tokens?
Can transaction data be exported?
Is a secondary acquirer permitted?
Who provides support if the account is reviewed?
The contract should be assessed as carefully as the transaction rate.
Merchant Advice Service provides free, independent guidance for businesses comparing merchant accounts, gateways and acquiring arrangements.
MAS may be able to help with:
This can include identifying:
Which service has been closed
What information a replacement provider will need
Whether the reason appears commercial, operational or compliance-related
Which issues should be addressed before another application
MAS cannot make the old provider disclose protected financial-crime information or reverse its decision.
Potential providers can be considered against:
The business sector
Termination reason
Processing history
Chargeback performance
Transaction values
Countries
Payment channels
Previous provider correspondence
Not every provider accepts merchants following termination.
MAS can help the business understand the information an underwriter is likely to request and avoid submitting an application that repeats the same mismatch.
The solution may involve:
A new acquiring account
A compatible payment gateway
Payment links
Card terminals
Open banking
Bank payments
A properly underwritten secondary route
Once replacement processing is in place, the business may need to improve:
Provider communication
Chargeback monitoring
Fraud controls
Reporting
Volume forecasting
Customer terms
Evidence retention
Business-continuity planning
MAS does not provide legal representation, remove card-scheme listings or guarantee approval.
Include:
The business activity
Website address
Company location
Customer countries
Monthly card turnover
Average and maximum transaction value
Payment channels
Previous provider
Date of termination
Reason given
Whether processing has already stopped
Whether funds are being held
Chargeback and fraud history
Details of any compliance review
Whether MATCH Pro or VMSS has been mentioned
Required currencies
Gateway or integration requirements
Whether recurring payments are involved
Whether a replacement application has already been declined
Do not hide the termination.
A potential provider is likely to discover material information during underwriting, and an incomplete application may lead to another closure.
MAS will first review the basic business and termination circumstances.
Where a potential route appears available, this may involve:
Clarifying which service has been terminated
Understanding the reason and effective date
Reviewing the business and transaction profile
Identifying issues that need remediation
Considering providers with relevant appetite
Explaining the likely document requirements
In some cases, the correct advice may be to resolve a compliance, licensing, chargeback or scheme issue before another application is made.
This article provides general payments information and is not legal, regulatory or data-protection advice. Merchant agreements, card-scheme requirements and termination rights differ. Obtain specialist advice where a termination, withheld funds or industry listing is disputed.
Choose an area below and we'll take you to the relevant guide, where you can understand your options and find suitable providers.
Understand merchant accounts, acquiring and card processing options.
Online payments, ecommerce, recurring payments and complex integrations.
Explore options for taking face-to-face card payments.
Explore EPOS, POS and integrated payment setups for your business.
Guidance for businesses with more complex underwriting or payment requirements.
Explore business funding linked to your card sales.
Tell us how your business takes payments and what you're looking to change. We'll use your answers to understand your requirements and identify providers that may be suitable.
Merchant Advice Service helps businesses understand their payment requirements before approaching providers.
How Merchant Advice Service works →If your business already takes card payments, you may be able to access funding linked to your future card sales.
Explore merchant cash advance →Tell us about your business, how you take payments and what you're looking to change. We'll use your answers to identify providers that may be suitable.
Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
