Merchant Accounts for Travel Agents
Published - 14 November 2024
Revised - 14 August 2026


Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
Travel businesses can be more difficult to place with payment providers because customers often pay well before the service is delivered, transaction values can be higher and refunds or cancellations may create additional financial exposure.
Merchant Advice Service is an independent UK payments information, comparison and provider-matching service with experience helping travel businesses assess specialist payment requirements. MAS looks at the structure of the business and its payment requirements rather than treating every travel merchant in the same way.
Travel businesses often need more from their payment setup than a standard merchant account can provide.
Customers may pay months before they travel, bookings can involve several suppliers and a cancellation can create a large number of refunds at once. Travel merchants may also need to accept international cards, multiple currencies, deposits, balance payments and bookings made online or over the telephone.
These characteristics can make travel more difficult for acquiring banks to underwrite.
A suitable travel payment arrangement may involve:
A specialist travel merchant account
An acquiring bank that understands delayed fulfilment
A payment gateway connected to the booking platform
Smart routing between more than one provider
Carefully controlled retry functionality
Fraud prevention and booking protection
Deposits and scheduled balance payments
Multi-currency processing
Clear reporting and reconciliation
Settlement and reserve terms suited to the business model
This guide explains how travel merchant accounts work, what providers examine during underwriting and how travel companies can build a more stable payment setup.
Merchant Advice Service helps travel businesses understand which acquiring banks, payment providers and gateways may be suitable for their particular requirements.
This may include businesses that:
Have been declined by a mainstream provider
Have received notice that an account will be closed
Need to improve payment authorisation rates
Want to connect more than one acquirer
Need payment processing integrated with a booking system
Accept deposits followed by balance payments
Require international acquiring or multiple currencies
Need help managing reserves, settlement and cash flow
Want clearer reporting across several payment providers
MAS does not approve merchant accounts or guarantee that an application will be accepted. The final decision, pricing and account terms are set by the acquiring bank or payment provider following its own underwriting.
A travel merchant account is a card-processing facility underwritten for a travel agency, tour operator, booking platform or another travel-related business.
It allows the company to receive card-payment settlements from customer bookings.
Travel agencies and tour operators are commonly associated with merchant category code 4722, although airlines, accommodation providers, passenger transport businesses and other travel merchants can be assigned different codes.
The provider should understand:
What type of travel is being sold
Whether the business acts as principal, organiser or agent
How far in advance customers pay
Which party is responsible for delivering the booking
How customer funds are protected
When suppliers are paid
What happens when a booking is cancelled
Which countries and currencies are involved
How refunds and chargebacks are managed
A general ecommerce account may not be suitable where the provider has not knowingly agreed to support the travel business model.
Travel is commonly classified as higher risk because there can be a long period between the customer making payment and receiving the service.
This creates future-delivery exposure for the acquiring bank.
When a customer pays £5,000 for a holiday taking place six months later, the provider may remain financially exposed throughout that period. If the travel business fails or cannot deliver the booking, customers may seek refunds or dispute their card payments.
Other risk factors can include:
High average transaction values
Seasonal peaks in booking volumes
International card payments
Supplier failure
Flight or accommodation cancellations
Political events and natural disasters
Customer disputes
Complex package arrangements
Deposits taken long before departure
Balance payments collected automatically
Refund obligations
Dependence on third-party suppliers
Travel and hospitality also tend to experience relatively high-value chargebacks. Mastercard research published in 2025 identified travel and hospitality as having the highest average chargeback value among the sectors it examined.
Being categorised as high risk does not mean that the travel company is unstable or badly run. It means the provider needs to understand and manage a larger potential financial liability.
Specialist payment processing may be required by:
High-street and online travel agents
Tour operators
Online travel agencies
Flight-booking businesses
Package-holiday organisers
Villa and holiday-let booking platforms
Cruise specialists
Ski and activity-holiday businesses
School and educational trip providers
Sports-tour operators
Wedding and honeymoon travel specialists
Luxury and private travel companies
Coach-tour operators
Business travel companies
Destination-management companies
Travel marketplaces
Membership-based travel clubs
A provider that accepts one type of travel business will not necessarily accept them all.
For example, an acquirer may support a UK travel agent selling holidays under an established principal’s ATOL but decline:
A new tour operator acting as principal
A business selling flight-inclusive packages under its own name
A merchant targeting unsupported countries
A marketplace receiving money on behalf of multiple suppliers
A travel club using an unclear membership model
A business with unusually long delivery periods
An operator without suitable insolvency protection
The exact business and payment structure matter more than the word “travel” alone.
A typical online card payment involves:
The customer entering their card details
The payment gateway securely transmitting the transaction
The acquiring bank passing the authorisation request through the card network
The customer’s issuing bank approving or declining the payment
The authorised payment being captured
The funds being settled to the travel merchant under the agreed terms
Travel payment arrangements can become more complicated where:
A deposit is taken initially
The balance is collected several months later
Part of the money belongs to a supplier
The booking contains protected and unprotected elements
Different currencies are involved
The merchant acts as agent rather than principal
The payment must be reconciled against several booking references
Refunds need to be divided between suppliers
Several acquirers or payment methods are being used
The merchant account, gateway and booking system must therefore be designed to work together.
The merchant account is the acquiring facility through which card payments are processed and settled.
The payment gateway provides the technical connection between the travel company’s website, booking platform and acquiring bank.
The gateway may also provide:
Payment links
Virtual-terminal payments
Tokenised card storage
Deposit and balance collection
Payment routing
Fraud screening
3D Secure
Multi-currency checkout
Reporting
Refund management
Connections to several acquiring banks
A travel company may have one gateway connected to several acquiring relationships.
This can reduce the amount of development work needed when an acquirer is added or replaced, provided the gateway supports the required connections.
A business selling flight-inclusive packages or certain flight-only arrangements to UK consumers may need to hold an ATOL, act as an agent of an ATOL holder or fall within a recognised exemption.
The ATOL requirements can also apply to companies established outside the UK where they advertise and sell relevant arrangements to consumers in the UK.
An ATOL is not a payment-processing licence, and a merchant account does not replace ATOL protection.
During underwriting, a payment provider may ask:
Does the business hold its own ATOL?
Is it an agent of another ATOL holder?
Is it a member of an accredited body?
Which company is named on the ATOL?
Do the website and booking terms match the licensed structure?
Which bookings are ATOL protected?
How are unprotected elements described?
Is the business acting as principal or agent?
When are ATOL certificates issued?
Where a customer makes the first payment for an ATOL-protected flight or trip, the ATOL certificate must be issued immediately. Taking the customer’s card details can count as taking payment for this purpose, even where the transaction has not yet been processed.
Travel businesses should obtain specialist advice where they are unsure whether an ATOL is required.
The Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations establish consumer-protection obligations for businesses arranging relevant combinations of travel services.
The rules can affect:
Information provided before booking
Responsibility for delivering the package
Changes and cancellations
Refunds
Insolvency protection
The distinction between an organiser and retailer
Linked travel arrangements
The 2018 regulations remain the current framework for bookings made during 2026. Official government guidance explains how they apply to organisers and travel businesses.
Amendment regulations were signed into law in April 2026 but do not take effect until 6 April 2027. Among other changes, they will alter the treatment of linked travel arrangements and create a 14-day refund obligation where a third-party supplier cancels a travel service forming part of a package.
Payment providers may consider how the travel company meets its refund and insolvency-protection obligations when assessing the account.
This article provides payments information rather than legal advice. Travel businesses should confirm how the regulations apply to their own booking model.
Travel merchant account applications normally require more information than an ordinary retail application.
The provider may request:
Certificate of incorporation
Ownership structure
Director and shareholder information
Trading and registered addresses
Business bank statements
Management accounts
Financial forecasts
Evidence of capital or funding
Group-company information
This may include:
ATOL details
ABTA or other trade memberships
Agency agreements
Insolvency-protection arrangements
Insurance details
Package Travel Regulation compliance
Supplier agreements
Legal opinions where the structure is unusual
Providers may review:
Booking terms and conditions
Cancellation policy
Refund policy
Privacy notice
Customer contact information
ATOL wording
Financial-protection information
Complaints procedure
Delivery and departure periods
Details of the merchant of record
The full customer-booking journey
The application may need to explain:
Expected annual and monthly card turnover
Seasonal booking peaks
Average and maximum transaction value
The average period between payment and travel
Deposit and balance-payment arrangements
Cardholder countries
Booking destinations
Accepted currencies
Online and telephone-payment volumes
Refund history
Chargeback history
Existing processing arrangements
Previous account closures or restrictions
Providers may also examine:
When airlines, hotels and other suppliers are paid
Whether supplier payments are refundable
How much customer money is held at any time
How cancelled bookings are refunded
Whether funds are ring-fenced or protected
What happens if a supplier fails
How the company would fund a large refund event
A clear application should show how money moves from the customer through the travel business and onwards to the supplier.
For travel businesses, provider selection should begin with the structure of the business rather than the word “travel” alone.
A holiday-let operator, travel agent, tour operator, booking platform and private aviation business can have very different payment profiles. Merchant Advice Service looks at factors such as what is being sold, when the customer pays, when the service is delivered, average transaction values, refund and cancellation policies, customer locations and processing history.
The more accurately the business model is presented at the start, the easier it is to identify providers whose appetite is genuinely relevant.
Travel applications are rarely assessed using the merchant category alone.
Two companies selling similar holidays can receive different decisions because their financial exposure and operating models are different.
Merchant Advice Service commonly sees problems where:
The merchant applies to a provider that does not accept future-delivery travel
The ATOL holder and merchant-account applicant do not match
The role of the principal and agent is unclear
The website does not explain who is responsible for the booking
The company cannot evidence insolvency protection
Projected transaction values are inconsistent with its financial position
The delivery period is longer than the provider permits
Previous chargebacks or termination have not been disclosed
The business takes customer money before suppliers confirm availability
Deposits and balance payments have not been correctly structured
The provider does not support the customer countries or destinations
The business needs a marketplace or payment-facilitation model rather than a standard merchant account
The company cannot demonstrate how a large cancellation event would be funded
Finding an acquirer that accepts “travel” is not enough.
The provider must accept the precise combination of:
Travel activity
Merchant role
Financial protection
Delivery period
Customer location
Transaction value
Supplier exposure
Processing history
Preparing this information before an application is submitted can reduce unnecessary declines.
A declined card payment does not necessarily mean the customer has insufficient funds or is attempting fraud.
Travel bookings can be declined because:
The transaction is unusually large
The card is being used from another country
The issuer considers the purchase unusual
The customer’s information is incomplete
Strong customer authentication is required
The acquiring route performs poorly for that card or market
A technical or network problem occurs
The issuer does not recognise the travel merchant
The payment is being collected without the customer present
Travel businesses should monitor authorisation rates by:
Acquiring bank
Card issuer
Card type
Customer country
Currency
Transaction value
Booking channel
Decline reason
Gateway
3D Secure outcome
Looking only at one overall approval percentage can hide where payments are being lost.
Smart routing allows a payment to be sent to the acquiring route most likely to process it successfully.
Routing decisions may consider:
Card country
Transaction currency
Booking value
Card type
Acquirer availability
Historic authorisation performance
Cost
Fraud score
Regulatory requirements
For example, a UK-issued card paying in pounds may perform better through a different route from a European-issued card paying in euros.
Routing should follow transparent rules and the terms agreed with each acquirer. It should not be used to conceal activity or bypass a provider’s restrictions.
Some declined payments can be retried, but not every decline should be submitted again.
A retry may be appropriate following:
A temporary processing error
An unavailable issuer
Certain soft declines
A recoverable authentication issue
A temporary insufficient-funds response where the customer has authorised a later collection
A retry is unlikely to work where:
The card has been reported lost or stolen
The issuer has instructed the merchant not to retry
The card details are invalid
The transaction is not permitted
The customer has withdrawn authority
Authentication has not been completed
Payment systems should use the decline and network-advice codes returned with the transaction. Excessive retries can look like fraudulent behaviour and may cause further legitimate transactions to be declined. Payment networks and processors limit how and when a declined transaction can be reattempted.
The aim is intelligent recovery of appropriate declines, not repeatedly forcing the same transaction through the network.
A travel business may use more than one acquirer to support:
Different currencies
Different customer regions
Higher payment volumes
Local acquiring
Specialist travel requirements
Operational resilience
Improved authorisation performance
Connecting every provider separately can create technical and reporting problems.
A single gateway or payment-orchestration layer may allow the business to manage several providers through one integration.
Potential benefits include:
Centralised routing rules
Consistent tokenisation
One checkout experience
Easier provider changes
Consolidated reporting
Failover during an outage
More control over currency and geography
Less repeated development work
However, using more providers also creates additional commercial and operational considerations.
Travel companies should confirm:
Who stores the payment token
Whether tokens can be moved between providers
Which provider is the merchant of record
Who handles 3D Secure
How refunds are routed
Whether reporting is truly consolidated
How disputes are managed
What happens when one acquirer is unavailable
Whether every provider has approved the complete travel model
Multiple acquiring routes should not be used to hide chargebacks, divide problematic volume or continue processing after a legitimate termination.
Travel fraud can affect both the customer and the travel company.
Common risks can include:
Stolen-card bookings
Account takeover
Fraudulent amendments
Last-minute high-value travel
Bookings made for another passenger
Mismatched customer and passenger details
Loyalty-point fraud
Friendly fraud
False claims that travel was not provided
Supplier or accommodation fraud
A suitable fraud strategy may use:
3D Secure
Device information
Address and security-code checks
Cardholder and passenger matching
Velocity controls
Email and telephone verification
Booking-history checks
IP and location analysis
Manual review for unusual bookings
Supplier verification
Chargeback alerts
Clear evidence retention
Fraud controls should reflect the booking risk.
A rigid rule that blocks every booking where the passenger and cardholder differ may reject legitimate family or corporate travel. Equally, automatically accepting every high-value last-minute booking can create unnecessary exposure.
“Booking protection” can refer to several different services, including:
Fraud screening
Chargeback-management tools
Supplier-failure protection
Insurance-backed protection
Cancellation cover
Insolvency protection
Customer travel insurance
These services are not interchangeable.
A fraud tool does not replace ATOL protection, and travel insurance does not remove the merchant’s refund obligations.
Travel businesses should establish exactly:
What event is protected
Who is insured or protected
What exclusions apply
Whether protection covers the merchant or customer
How a claim is made
Whether refunds or chargebacks are covered
What happens if a supplier fails
The payment provider, insurer and travel company may each be responsible for different parts of the booking.
Travel-payment reconciliation can be difficult because one booking may include:
An initial deposit
One or more balance payments
Supplier payments
Amendments
Partial refunds
Foreign-exchange adjustments
Booking fees
Chargebacks
Insurance or protection products
Payments processed by different providers
The payment reference should link clearly to the booking reference.
Useful reporting should allow the business to see:
The original booking value
Each customer payment
The acquiring provider used
The settlement received
Provider fees
Currency-conversion costs
Refunds
Chargebacks
Reserve deductions
Supplier payments
Outstanding balances
Where several providers are used, consolidated reporting can reduce manual work. However, the travel business should still be able to trace each individual payment back to the acquirer and transaction record.
Good reconciliation is not merely an accounting benefit. It also helps with:
Customer complaints
Chargeback evidence
Refund calculations
ATOL records
Supplier disputes
Cash-flow forecasting
Identifying missing settlements
The CAA requires travel agents affected by an ATOL-holder failure to produce detailed booking and payment records, including evidence of customer receipts and payments passed to the ATOL holder.
Travel companies can collect substantial customer funds while also facing large supplier commitments and future refund exposure.
A travel-specific payment review may consider:
Providers may offer:
Weekly settlement
Deferred settlement
Settlement after a risk-hold period
Different settlement arrangements by currency
Faster settlement can improve available cash, but it may be accompanied by:
A rolling reserve
Higher fees
A security deposit
Volume restrictions
Closer monitoring
A rolling reserve is a percentage of settlements held for an agreed period to cover future refunds, chargebacks or business failure.
Travel merchants should confirm:
The percentage retained
How long each amount is held
Whether there is a fixed reserve cap
When funds are released
Whether the reserve can be increased
What happens if the account closes
Whether seasonal peaks affect the calculation
A lower processing rate may not represent better value where a large reserve restricts working capital.
Taking a deposit followed by a later balance can reduce the customer’s initial payment, but it must be structured correctly.
The company should consider:
When the balance becomes due
How the customer authorises later payments
Whether the card credential is stored securely
What happens if the balance payment fails
Whether a new authentication is required
How cancellations affect each payment
Whether the supplier has already been paid
Depending on the business and customer, options may include:
Open-banking payments
Bank transfers
Payment links
Virtual terminals
Instalment arrangements
Business or lodge cards
Virtual cards for supplier payments
Multi-currency accounts
Each method has different implications for cost, customer protection, refunds, reconciliation and fraud.
Alternative payment methods should complement the card strategy rather than being selected purely to avoid chargeback exposure.
A rolling reserve is money retained temporarily from the merchant’s card settlements.
For example, an acquirer may hold an agreed percentage of each settlement for several months and then release it on a rolling basis.
The provider may base its reserve requirement on:
Advance-booking periods
Annual card turnover
Average transaction value
Refund history
Chargeback performance
Financial strength
Supplier-payment terms
Seasonality
Customer-fund protection
Previous processing history
Some providers may instead request:
An upfront security deposit
A bank guarantee
Deferred settlement
A fixed reserve
A combination of protections
Travel businesses should model the effect on working capital before accepting the account.
There is no standard price applying to all travel businesses.
Costs can be affected by:
Card turnover
Average booking value
Consumer and commercial card mix
Customer countries
Settlement currencies
Online and telephone-payment volumes
Chargeback performance
Advance-delivery periods
Reserve requirements
Number of acquiring routes
Gateway requirements
Fraud tools
Reporting
Provider risk appetite
Charges may include:
Acquiring margin
Card-scheme fees
Gateway fees
Authorisation charges
Refund fees
Chargeback fees
Currency-conversion costs
Monthly minimums
Payment-link or virtual-terminal fees
Fraud-screening charges
Setup and integration fees
Where the merchant, its acquirer and the card issuer are all located in the UK, regulated consumer-card interchange is generally capped at 0.2% for debit cards and 0.3% for credit cards. These caps do not represent the merchant’s full payment-processing cost.
Compare the total commercial arrangement rather than one headline transaction rate.
Before entering an agreement, ask:
Does the provider knowingly support our exact type of travel?
Does it understand whether we act as agent or principal?
Which customer countries are permitted?
Which destinations are restricted?
What is the maximum advance-delivery period?
Which licences and protection arrangements are required?
Is a rolling reserve needed?
How long are reserve funds retained?
What are the settlement times?
Are deposits and scheduled balance payments supported?
Can we take telephone payments?
Which currencies are available?
Is local acquiring available?
Can the gateway connect several acquirers?
Does the solution support smart routing?
How are retries controlled?
Which fraud tools are included?
How are refunds and chargebacks reported?
Can transactions be reconciled to booking references?
What happens if booking volumes increase?
Can the provider change the reserve?
What are the termination rights?
How long can funds be held after termination?
Who provides technical and account support?
Can we export our payment data and tokens if we leave?
The lowest quoted rate is not necessarily the most suitable solution.
A terminated merchant account can prevent a travel company from taking new bookings while customer refunds and future departures remain outstanding.
Possible causes include:
Higher-than-expected transaction volume
Excessive chargebacks
Fraud alerts
A change in the travel model
Longer delivery periods
Unsupported customer countries
Regulatory or licensing concerns
Undisclosed supplier relationships
Financial deterioration
Card-scheme monitoring
A change in the provider’s risk appetite
The business should first request written clarification and gather:
Termination correspondence
Processing statements
Chargeback reports
Refund data
Current financial information
ATOL and protection documents
Supplier agreements
Evidence of corrective action
Details of retained funds
Current and future booking exposure
Do not submit numerous replacement applications before understanding why the existing facility was closed.
A new acquirer is likely to ask about previous termination, and failure to disclose it can lead to another closure.
Merchant Advice Service provides free, independent guidance for businesses comparing merchant accounts, gateways and payment arrangements.
MAS can help travel businesses explore options for:
This may include reviewing whether the payment setup supports:
Smart routing
Local or regional acquiring
Appropriate 3D Secure use
Analysis of decline reasons
Carefully controlled automatic retries
Alternative payment methods
No provider can guarantee that every valid payment will be approved. The aim is to identify avoidable declines and route transactions more effectively.
MAS works with a network of banks, acquirers, gateways and specialist payment businesses.
Potential routes are assessed against the information provided by the merchant, including:
Travel activity
Customer countries
Booking values
Advance-delivery period
Processing history
Licences and protection
Technical requirements
Provider appetite can change, and all applications remain subject to underwriting.
Where appropriate, a gateway or orchestration solution may allow several acquiring relationships to be brought together through one integration.
This can support routing, reporting and operational resilience without requiring the travel business to rebuild its checkout for every provider.
MAS can help travel merchants identify payment solutions that include suitable fraud controls or connect to specialist fraud and booking-protection services.
The business should confirm exactly what is covered and ensure that any protection complements rather than replaces its legal and regulatory obligations.
For travel businesses using several providers, currencies or booking channels, MAS can help identify solutions offering more centralised transaction reporting and clearer links between payments, settlements and booking records.
MAS can help merchants compare travel-specific considerations such as:
Settlement frequency
Reserve arrangements
Deposit and balance payments
Multi-currency settlement
Supplier-payment solutions
Alternative payment methods
MAS does not set the provider’s final terms or guarantee improved cash flow. Each commercial proposal should be modelled against the company’s actual booking and supplier commitments.
Providing the right information at the beginning makes it easier to identify whether a suitable route may exist.
Include:
The exact travel activity
Whether you act as agent, organiser or principal
ATOL or other protection details
Whether you currently process card payments
Annual and monthly card turnover
Average and maximum booking value
Average time between payment and travel
Customer countries
Travel destinations
Required currencies
Online, telephone and face-to-face payment volumes
Deposit and balance-payment arrangements
Current provider and gateway
Refund and chargeback history
Required booking-system integration
Details of any previous decline or termination
Whether you require one or several acquiring routes
Sensitive documents do not normally need to be sent with an initial enquiry unless requested.
MAS will initially review the travel business and its payment requirements.
Where a potential route appears available, the process may involve:
Clarifying the merchant’s role and travel activity
Understanding the booking and customer-payment journey
Reviewing processing volumes and future-delivery exposure
Identifying potential providers with suitable travel appetite
Considering gateway, routing and integration requirements
Explaining the information likely to be needed
Making an introduction where appropriate
Merchant Advice Service is not tied to one provider and does not make underwriting decisions. Businesses do not pay MAS for its initial matching and introduction service; MAS may receive a commission from a partner following a successful introduction.
This article provides general payments information and is not legal, accounting, regulatory or insurance advice. Travel protection, Package Travel Regulation and ATOL requirements depend on the individual business model. Obtain specialist advice and confirm current requirements with the relevant authorities and payment providers.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.