Interchange Fees Explained: UK Rates, IC+ and IC++ Pricing
Published - 20 April 2023
Revised - 09 September 2026


Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
Interchange is one of the underlying costs involved when a business accepts a card payment. It usually sits alongside card-scheme fees, payment-provider margin and other processing charges within the overall amount paid by the merchant.
Merchant Advice Service is an independent UK payments information, comparison and provider-matching service that helps businesses understand how card-processing costs are structured.
Interchange is particularly important when comparing providers because it helps separate underlying card costs from provider margin and other charges within the wider processing arrangement.
Interchange is one component of the overall cost of accepting card payments, rather than the total merchant-account price. Our Merchant Accounts guide explains how acquiring, payment providers, pricing and merchant-account requirements fit together.
An interchange fee is an underlying card-payment fee that is generally paid by the merchant's acquiring side to the bank or financial institution that issued the customer's card.
In a typical four-party card transaction, the main participants are:
The interchange fee flows between the acquiring and issuing sides of that payment chain. The merchant does not normally receive a separate interchange invoice from the customer's bank. Instead, interchange usually forms part of the wider cost of accepting the transaction.
The Payment Systems Regulator explains interchange and merchant charges for UK businesses.
This four-party explanation is most directly applicable to schemes such as Visa and Mastercard. Other card arrangements, including American Express, can operate differently.
No.
This is one of the most important distinctions for businesses comparing card-processing costs.
Your merchant service charge, sometimes shortened to MSC, is the wider charge associated with accepting card payments.
Depending on your provider and pricing structure, card-processing costs can include:
The UK Interchange Fee Regulation caps certain interchange fees. It does not impose a general cap on the total merchant service charge that your payment provider charges you.
For consumer-card transactions that fall within the UK Interchange Fee Regulation, the current headline caps are:
| Card type | UK interchange cap where applicable | Maximum interchange on £100 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer debit and prepaid card | 0.20% | 20p |
| Consumer credit card | 0.30% | 30p |
Following the UK's withdrawal from the EU, these caps apply to relevant consumer-card transactions where the merchant, acquirer and issuer are all located within the UK.
The percentages are caps rather than a universal merchant processing price.
For example, if a customer spends £100 using an eligible UK consumer debit card, the interchange component cannot exceed 20p where the 0.20% cap applies.
That does not mean the merchant's total cost of processing the £100 transaction is 20p. Other payment costs may sit on top of interchange.
See the Payment Systems Regulator's current UK Interchange Fee Regulation guidance for the regulatory position.
No.
The headline UK caps relate to consumer debit, prepaid and credit transactions within the scope of the UK Interchange Fee Regulation.
Businesses should not assume that every transaction they process will therefore have interchange of 0.20% or 0.30%.
Transactions can fall outside that straightforward domestic consumer-card position, including where:
This is one reason the effective cost of accepting cards can be significantly different between two businesses even when their total processing turnover is similar.
Cross-border payments between the UK and the European Economic Area are particularly important for ecommerce and international businesses.
Following the UK's withdrawal from the EU, consumer cross-border transactions where the issuer or acquirer is outside the UK's jurisdiction are no longer covered by the UK domestic interchange caps in the same way.
Visa and Mastercard subsequently increased interchange fees on certain card-not-present consumer transactions between the UK and EEA from:
The Payment Systems Regulator has carried out a market review into these UK-EEA cross-border interchange fees and concluded that certain card-not-present fees had risen to unduly high levels.
As at August 2026, the PSR is continuing work on the methodology for a potential longer-term price cap. It has decided not to introduce an interim cap while that work continues.
Businesses with significant European card volumes should therefore look carefully at their international card mix when comparing payment providers.
Read the PSR's latest cross-border interchange fee work.
Interchange should not be confused with scheme fees.
Card schemes charge fees associated with using their payment networks and processing infrastructure. These are separate from the interchange fee associated with the issuing bank.
The distinction matters because a merchant can be quoted a pricing model that passes through both:
This is the basis of many cost-plus or Interchange++ pricing models.
The PSR has separately reviewed card-scheme and processing fees in the UK, including concerns around fee complexity and transparency.
With blended pricing, the merchant generally pays an agreed rate without seeing every underlying network-cost component separately for each transaction.
A simple example might look like:
1.5% + 20p per transaction
The provider uses that price to cover the relevant underlying card costs and its commercial margin.
Blended pricing has some advantages:
Its limitation is that the merchant has less visibility into how much of the charge relates to underlying card costs and how much relates to provider economics.
Interchange-plus is a cost-plus pricing structure where underlying card costs are passed through to the merchant and the payment provider adds its own agreed markup.
This can give a business greater visibility into how its processing costs are generated.
However, terminology differs between providers.
Some providers use terms including:
These terms are not always used identically across the industry.
For example, Stripe's current pricing policy says its IC+ model may also be referred to as Interchange++, Cost Plus or Network Cost Plus.
That means businesses should not assume that the number of '+' symbols tells them exactly what is included.
Ask the provider to show you precisely which costs are passed through and which element represents its own margin.
In common payments terminology, an Interchange++ structure is often explained as three broad components:
The attraction of this structure is transparency: the merchant can see more clearly how the cost of accepting different cards changes.
But because provider terminology varies, the contract and pricing schedule remain more important than the label itself.
| Pricing model | How it works | Potential advantage | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blended | Underlying costs are combined into an agreed merchant rate. | Simplicity and easier forecasting. | Total cost, card categories, international rates and additional charges. |
| IC+ / cost plus | Underlying network costs are passed through with a provider markup. | Greater visibility into the cost of different transactions. | Exactly which network costs are passed through and how markup is calculated. |
| IC++ / Interchange++ | Often used to describe interchange, scheme/network costs and provider margin separately. | Granular cost transparency. | Provider terminology varies, so confirm the contractual definition. |
No.
This is where businesses can easily confuse transparency with price.
An IC++ structure may make the individual components of payment processing easier to see, but that does not automatically mean the final bill will be lower.
The result depends on factors including:
A well-priced blended agreement can therefore cost less than an expensive IC++ agreement, and a competitive IC++ structure can cost less than a high blended rate.
The pricing label alone does not answer the question.
Interchange should not be confused with the total cost of accepting a payment. A merchant may also pay scheme fees, acquiring margin, gateway fees, authorisation charges and other payment-platform costs.
For online payments, see our Payment Gateway Fees UK 2026 guide for a breakdown of the wider payment-cost stack.
Merchant Advice Service view
Transparency and price are not the same thing.
Businesses often ask Merchant Advice Service whether moving from blended pricing to Interchange++ will automatically reduce their processing costs. Our view is that the comparison should start with the business's real transaction data rather than the pricing model.
A detailed pricing structure can make it considerably easier to understand where costs originate, particularly for higher-volume merchants. But the meaningful comparison is still the actual pound-for-pound cost of processing the same transaction mix through each proposed arrangement.
If one provider quotes 0.35% above interchange and another quotes a single blended percentage, those figures cannot be compared properly in isolation.
You need to know what each quote would have cost against the same cards, transaction values, payment channels and international mix.
Consider a £100 transaction where the UK domestic consumer-card caps apply.
| Transaction | Applicable interchange cap | Maximum interchange component on £100 |
|---|---|---|
| UK consumer debit/prepaid | 0.20% | £0.20 |
| UK consumer credit | 0.30% | £0.30 |
Those figures represent the interchange component only.
For example, a £100 UK consumer debit transaction subject to the cap could have a maximum interchange component of 20p, but the merchant may also pay scheme/network costs, its provider's processing margin and any other applicable transaction charges.
This is why it is incorrect to say that UK debit-card processing should cost merchants only 0.20%.
Generally, a merchant does not negotiate the applicable scheme-set interchange category directly with its acquiring provider in the same way it may negotiate the provider's own commercial margin.
What businesses can often assess or negotiate includes:
For larger businesses, relatively small changes in provider margin can become significant when multiplied across a high annual card turnover.
Read our guide to reducing payment fees when processing £1 million or more per month.
Two businesses processing exactly £1 million a month can have very different payment costs.
One may predominantly accept UK consumer debit cards in person.
The other may process:
The underlying cost profile can therefore be different even before the payment provider's own margin is considered.
This is why Merchant Advice Service generally recommends using historical processing data when comparing provider quotes.
The amount of detail shown on merchant statements varies according to provider and pricing model.
On a blended plan, you may primarily see aggregated transaction rates and charges.
Under a more detailed cost-plus arrangement, statements or reporting can contain far more information about card categories, network costs and provider charges.
When reviewing a statement, look for information relating to:
Read our full guide to understanding merchant processing statements.
The cleanest comparison uses the same underlying business data for both providers.
Ideally, compare quotes using:
Then include all relevant charges rather than comparing only the most prominent percentage on the quote.
A useful question to ask a prospective provider is:
“What would this pricing model have cost me against my actual last three months of transactions?”
That is considerably more meaningful than asking which provider has the lowest advertised rate.
There is no single answer that applies to every business.
A smaller merchant may value a straightforward blended rate because it is simple to understand and reconcile.
A larger merchant or business with a varied card mix may place greater value on the visibility offered by cost-plus pricing.
Businesses with significant processing volumes may also be in a stronger position to negotiate provider margin and analyse the financial effect of small pricing differences.
The important point is to compare the total commercial outcome, not assume one pricing model is inherently better because it appears more sophisticated.
Interchange is only one component of payment-provider selection.
Depending on your business, you may also need to compare:
For a broader comparison, read Compare UK Payment Providers.
Merchant Advice Service is a UK business-to-business payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.
Founded in 2016, MAS helps businesses understand their payment requirements and identify payment providers or specialist partners that may be relevant to the way they operate.
We provide information and support across areas including:
Merchant Advice Service is not an acquiring bank, lender or payment processor and does not make final underwriting decisions.
The MAS information, matching and introduction service is free to businesses. MAS may receive commission or a referral fee from some commercial partners where an introduction results in a completed product or account.
For full information about how our service operates, provider matching, independence and commercial relationships, read How Merchant Advice Service Works.
Merchant Advice Service is an independent payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.
Our editorial content may reference payment providers, technology companies and financial institutions regardless of whether Merchant Advice Service has a commercial relationship with them.
Where providers are named for comparison, research or technical examples, inclusion does not constitute a recommendation and should not be taken to mean that Merchant Advice Service can introduce businesses to that provider.
MAS may receive commission or a referral fee from some commercial partners where a business chooses to proceed following an introduction. Commercial relationships do not determine which providers may be referenced within our independent educational content.
Providers have not paid for inclusion in this article unless explicitly stated.
Provider capabilities, pricing, integrations and acceptance criteria can change. Businesses should confirm current information directly with the relevant provider before making a decision.
Last reviewed: 14 August 2026.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.