EPOS Now & Dojo Integration Ended: What It Means & Alternatives
Published - 24 April 2026
Revised - 07 September 2026
Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
If you previously used Epos Now and Dojo together for integrated card payments, changes to the relationship between the two providers mean some businesses have had to reconsider how their till and payment terminal work together.
Dojo representatives publicly stated in 2026 that Epos Now had deactivated the integration. Businesses affected by the change may therefore need to decide whether to:
The right decision depends on contracts, processing costs, integrations, operational disruption and which part of the existing setup provides the most value to the business.
MAS View: The Epos Now and Dojo situation highlights a wider risk with integrated payments: a merchant can be happy with both its EPOS and its payment provider, but still be affected if the commercial or technical relationship between the two changes. Integration compatibility should therefore be considered alongside payment rates and contract terms when choosing a setup.
Epos Now and Dojo previously supported businesses that wanted their EPOS system and Dojo card terminals to communicate directly.
In 2026, Dojo representatives publicly stated that Epos Now had decided to deactivate the integration. Businesses using the combination were subsequently faced with decisions about how they wanted to continue taking payments.
The exact position can vary according to the merchant's account, existing configuration and contractual arrangements. Businesses should therefore confirm the current position relating to their own account directly with both providers before cancelling or replacing anything.
This is particularly important where a merchant has separate:
The key distinction is between taking payments and having those payments fully integrated with the EPOS system.
A standalone card terminal can operate separately from an EPOS system in many circumstances. The member of staff enters the transaction into the till and then manually enters the amount into the payment terminal.
That is different from an integrated setup where the EPOS automatically sends the amount to the card machine and the payment result is returned to the till.
If your Epos Now and Dojo integration has been affected, ask both providers to confirm in writing:
Integrated payments connect the card terminal with the software being used to record the sale.
Instead of a member of staff typing £74.50 into the EPOS and then separately typing £74.50 into the card machine, the till sends the amount automatically.
This can help businesses:
Dojo currently promotes integrated payments across a large number of EPOS partners and describes automatic transaction synchronisation and reconciliation as key benefits of the model.
The wider issue is therefore not limited to Epos Now and Dojo. Businesses increasingly need to understand who controls the connection between their EPOS and payment provider, and what happens if that relationship changes.
Our guide to integrated payments solutions explains the different integration models and what businesses should check before choosing a payment setup.
There are four main routes to consider.
| Option | Potential advantage | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Keep Epos Now and change payments | Retains existing till, menus, stock, reporting and staff workflows | Processing cost, supported terminals, contract and migration |
| Keep Dojo and change EPOS | Retains existing payment-provider relationship and potentially existing commercial terms | EPOS migration, data, integrations, hardware and staff training |
| Use Dojo separately | May minimise immediate changes | Manual entry, reconciliation, errors and any additional charges |
| Change both | Opportunity to redesign the payment and EPOS setup | Total migration cost, contracts, integrations and implementation |
If the Epos Now software works well for the business, changing the payment side may be the least disruptive route.
This can be particularly relevant where the EPOS system contains significant:
Before moving, establish which payment providers are currently supported by the specific Epos Now setup being used.
Potential options may include Epos Now's own payment proposition and other supported payment providers, depending on the merchant's account and requirements.
Do not choose purely on the basis of the headline transaction rate. Compare the total payment arrangement, including:
If the business is happy with Dojo, the alternative is to retain the payment relationship and find an EPOS system that supports the required Dojo integration.
Dojo currently states that it works with hundreds of EPOS providers, so businesses should assess which of those systems are appropriate for their sector and operational requirements rather than simply choosing the first compatible option.
This route may make sense where:
Changing EPOS can, however, be more involved than replacing card terminals.
The merchant may need to migrate menus, products, stock information, staff settings, reporting and integrations with systems such as accounting, booking, loyalty or ecommerce software.
Some businesses may decide that they do not need integrated payments at all.
In a standalone setup, staff enter the sale into the EPOS and then enter the payment amount separately into the card machine.
That may be perfectly workable for a lower-volume environment.
However, the impact can be much greater for a busy:
Manual entry can increase the risk of:
Businesses should therefore calculate the operational cost of losing integration rather than treating standalone processing as automatically equivalent.
An integration change can also provide a reason to reconsider the whole setup.
If both the EPOS and payment contracts are approaching renewal, or the business has outgrown the existing configuration, it may be more sensible to assess the overall payment architecture rather than replace one component in isolation.
This is particularly relevant for:
For these businesses, the question may no longer be simply “Which card machine works with my till?”
It may be:
“Which payment architecture gives us the flexibility to change technology or provider later without rebuilding the whole operation?”
There is no universal answer.
A useful way to make the decision is to identify which part of the current setup would be hardest or most expensive to replace.
| Consider keeping Epos Now if... | Consider keeping Dojo if... |
|---|---|
| Your staff and operations rely heavily on the existing EPOS | You are particularly happy with your payment arrangement |
| Your menus, stock or reporting would be difficult to migrate | Your existing EPOS is already due for replacement |
| You have several important Epos Now software integrations | You want access to an EPOS system that continues to support Dojo |
| A supported alternative payment provider meets your requirements | Changing the payment arrangement would create greater cost or disruption |
| Your EPOS contract is harder to exit | Your payment contract or commercial arrangement is more valuable to retain |
MAS View: Do not assume the cheaper component is automatically the right one to replace. For a business processing significant card volume, payment pricing can have a much larger long-term financial impact than the monthly cost of the EPOS software.
When an integration stops being available, there is a temptation to accept whichever replacement appears easiest.
Businesses should instead compare the total cost of each route.
For the payment side, review:
For the EPOS side, consider:
For businesses processing larger volumes, even a small difference in transaction pricing can outweigh an apparently cheaper EPOS migration.
Do not assume that because a payment provider and EPOS platform can technically connect, the integration supports everything the business currently uses.
Check whether the proposed combination supports:
Before replacing either provider, read our guide to integrated card machines and EPOS compatibility.
This is one of the most overlooked questions when businesses buy integrated-payment systems.
The merchant may have:
If something fails, businesses need to know who owns the problem.
Before signing a new agreement, ask:
The Epos Now and Dojo situation illustrates why integration should not be treated purely as a technical feature.
It can also create commercial dependency.
A tightly bundled system can be extremely convenient while everything works together. But if changing one component means replacing several others, the merchant may have less negotiating power when contracts or payment rates change.
This is particularly important for larger businesses.
A more flexible setup may involve:
EPOS → Integration Layer → Gateway / PSP → Acquirer
rather than one supplier controlling every part of the payment journey.
That does not automatically make the flexible structure better. A single-provider setup can be simpler to manage. The important thing is that merchants understand the trade-off between simplicity today and portability tomorrow.
If keeping Epos Now means changing the payment provider, treat the move as a planned migration rather than simply replacing a terminal.
Consider:
Our guide to switching card machine provider explains how to change without unnecessarily disrupting payments.
The decision becomes more important where a merchant has multiple locations.
A single-site café changing one terminal is very different from a restaurant group replacing dozens of devices and updating EPOS configurations across an estate.
Multi-site operators should assess:
Read our guide to merchant services for multi-location businesses.
For larger businesses, software companies and platforms, this type of integration issue raises a broader question about payment architecture.
The merchant may need payments to connect with:
At that point, simply finding another card terminal may not solve the wider requirement.
Businesses with more complex technology should consider whether they need a provider that supports payment API integration or a broader integrated-payment architecture.
MAS View: The more operational systems that depend on payments, the more important payment-provider portability becomes.
Before committing to another provider, ask:
The Epos Now and Dojo change is useful beyond the two providers involved.
Businesses increasingly rely on payment systems being connected to operational software.
That makes the relationship between providers important.
A merchant evaluating an integrated-payment system should therefore consider:
Compatibility → Ownership → Support → Commercial Terms → Portability → Continuity
not simply:
“Does this card machine connect to my till?”
A technically good integration can still create problems later if the business cannot easily move one component without changing the rest of its payment stack.
Merchant Advice Service helps businesses compare payment providers based on their existing technology, transaction profile and operational requirements.
Where an EPOS/payment integration has changed, we can help businesses look at the wider options including:
Merchant Advice Service is free for merchants to use. Where a business proceeds with a provider introduced through MAS, we may receive a referral fee or commission from that provider.
Learn more about how Merchant Advice Service works.
This article is intended to explain the payment and EPOS considerations for businesses affected by changes to the Epos Now and Dojo integration. Provider integrations, product availability, pricing and contractual arrangements can change. Merchants should confirm the current position relating to their specific account directly with the relevant providers before making contractual or operational changes.
Merchant Advice Service is an independent payment consultancy and comparison service. We may receive a referral fee or commission where a merchant chooses to proceed with a provider we introduce. This does not determine which providers we discuss or recommend.
Read more about how Merchant Advice Service researches and compares payment providers and our research and data methodology.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.