Integrated Card Machines & EPOS Compatibility: What to Check Before Choosing or Switching Provider
Published - 12 April 2024
Revised - 28 August 2026


Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
An integrated card machine should do more than accept a payment.
For many established businesses, the terminal forms part of a much wider payment system connecting:
That means changing card-machine provider is not always as simple as replacing one terminal with another.
A new provider may offer better transaction pricing or newer hardware but fail to integrate with the EPOS platform the business already uses.
Alternatively, a business may discover that its existing EPOS integration is effectively restricting which acquiring providers it can consider.
The right question is therefore not simply “Will this card machine take payments?” It is “Will this payment setup work with the rest of our business?”
This guide explains what UK businesses should check when choosing an integrated card machine, changing payment provider or reviewing an existing EPOS/payment integration.
An integrated card machine communicates directly with another system used by the business, most commonly an EPOS or till system.
Instead of a member of staff entering:
£47.85 into the till
and then manually typing:
£47.85 into the terminal,
the payment amount can be passed electronically from the EPOS system to the card machine.
Once the payment has been processed, the payment result can then be returned to the EPOS system.
This can create a much more joined-up transaction flow.
EPOS-connected terminals are one form of integrated payment, but larger businesses may also need payments to connect with ERP, CRM, accounting, booking or other operational systems.
Our Integrated Payments Solutions UK guide explains how the wider payment environment can connect across business software and workflows.
Integrated vs Standalone Card Machines
| Standalone Card Machine | Integrated Card Machine |
|---|---|
| Payment amount typically entered manually | Payment amount can be sent from the till or EPOS |
| Terminal operates largely independently | Terminal communicates with business software |
| Simple to deploy in some environments | Requires compatible software/integration |
| Reconciliation may involve separate systems | Payment and sale data can be more closely connected |
| Changing terminal can be relatively straightforward | Changing provider may require integration changes |
Neither model is automatically better.
A small independent retailer may be perfectly happy with a standalone terminal.
A restaurant group, hotel, multi-site retailer or high-volume venue may gain considerably more operational value from integrated payments.
The more transactions, staff, locations and systems a business has, the more important payment integration usually becomes.
The exact functionality depends on the systems involved, but an integrated payment journey can potentially allow:
For larger businesses, the operational benefit can be as important as the transaction rate.
Because the payment estate can contain technology supplied by several different companies.
A typical setup might involve:
EPOS provider → payment integration → terminal → acquiring provider → card scheme → customer's bank.
The fact that two businesses both support card payments does not mean their systems automatically communicate with each other.
Before selecting a new provider, establish exactly where the integration sits.
We would start with these questions:
Get these answers before signing the merchant-services agreement.
No.
This is one of the most important points on this page.
Compatibility can depend on:
A terminal might technically be capable of accepting Visa, Mastercard and contactless payments but still not work with the merchant's existing till integration.
A modern payment terminal may support:
That does not tell you whether it integrates with:
Payment-method compatibility and software compatibility should therefore be reviewed separately.
Potentially, yes.
But this needs to be established before changing provider.
There are several possible outcomes.
This is often the simplest route.
The new terminals can potentially be configured through an existing supported integration.
The merchant may need:
The merchant then needs to decide whether to:
This can also happen.
A previously supported relationship between a payment provider and EPOS platform may change.
We have already seen this issue in the UK market. See our recent article on Epos Now and Dojo no longer integrating.
This sounds obvious, but it is a common commercial problem.
A merchant negotiates an attractive processing rate.
Then, after signing, discovers:
the new terminals do not integrate with the existing EPOS system.
The business then has three poor options:
The correct order is:
requirements → compatibility → commercial comparison → contract → implementation.
Not:
cheap quote → sign → discover compatibility later.
Restaurants and hospitality businesses are one of the clearest use cases for integrated terminals.
Useful functionality can include:
If a hospitality group changes payment provider, it should establish whether those features continue to work in the replacement setup.
A cheaper rate is not a meaningful saving if staff need to return to manually entering every bill into the terminal.
Retail businesses may use integrated terminals to connect:
For multi-location retailers, payment-provider choice can therefore become a wider infrastructure decision rather than a terminal purchase.
See our Merchant Services for Multi-Location Retailers guide.
A multi-site business should think at estate level rather than terminal level.
Questions include:
The cheapest per-terminal rental may be largely irrelevant if the infrastructure is difficult to manage across 20, 50 or 100 locations.
Businesses may encounter the term semi-integrated payments.
Broadly, this describes an architecture where the business software and payment terminal communicate about the transaction without the merchant's core EPOS application necessarily handling the underlying cardholder data itself.
The exact architecture varies by provider.
This can allow the merchant's software to initiate and receive payment information while sensitive card processing remains within specialist payment components.
For merchants, the important questions are:
Potentially, yes.
Without integration, a member of staff might accidentally enter:
£56.70
into the till but:
£65.70
into the card machine.
An integrated payment flow can remove that manual step.
This can help reduce:
The benefit becomes more significant as transaction volumes increase.
Imagine a business processing £250,000 per month.
Provider A offers a slightly cheaper transaction rate but requires standalone terminals.
Provider B costs an additional:
0.03%.
On £250,000 monthly volume, that difference is:
£75 per month.
If integration saves several hours of reconciliation, reduces payment errors and improves staff efficiency across multiple locations, the £75 difference may be commercially insignificant.
This is an illustrative MAS calculation, not a provider-pricing benchmark.
Payment cost should include the operational cost of the payment process, not just the acquiring rate.
Before migrating, document the existing payment flow.
That should include:
Then compare the proposed new environment against it.
This identifies which parts of the payment estate actually need to change.
Sometimes.
A terminal may be physically capable of processing payments but still be configured for a particular provider or terminal-management environment.
Whether it can be reused depends on the hardware, provider, configuration, ownership and acquiring setup.
Businesses should confirm:
Do not assume that owning the physical terminal means it can automatically be used with any payment provider.
The acquiring agreement and terminal contract may not be the same agreement.
This matters when changing provider.
The Payment Systems Regulator found that POS-terminal contracts could discourage businesses from switching acquiring provider, including cases where merchants faced long contracts or potential early-termination charges.
For contracts within the scope of Specific Direction 16, relevant providers must limit the initial term of POS-terminal hire contracts to 18 months before moving to a rolling arrangement.
Read the Payment Systems Regulator's POS-terminal guidance.
See our Merchant Services Contract Renewal guide before signing or exiting an arrangement.
This is one of the most underrated questions in provider selection.
Imagine:
The till is working.
The card machine is working.
But the two have stopped communicating.
Who fixes it?
Potential parties might include:
Before implementing integrated payments, establish:
This is particularly important for hospitality, retail and businesses that trade evenings and weekends.
Businesses should have a contingency plan.
Depending on the setup, that may include:
The objective is not to create unnecessary duplicate infrastructure.
It is to understand how the business continues taking payments when one component fails.
See our Card Machine Connectivity guide.
Most modern integrated payment environments require network connectivity, although the exact connectivity options depend on the terminal and provider.
These may include:
For businesses where payment availability is critical, resilience should be part of the terminal decision.
A beautifully integrated solution that fails whenever the venue Wi-Fi has a problem is not necessarily the right solution.
Potentially.
Changing payment provider does not automatically change PCI DSS scope.
Changing the way payment data interacts with the merchant's systems might.
For example, moving between:
can create different PCI DSS considerations.
The business should understand how cardholder data moves through the proposed new environment before implementation.
See our PCI DSS When Changing Payment Provider guide and our wider PCI DSS Compliance Guide.
Some integrated terminal environments use point-to-point encryption technologies designed to protect account data between the payment terminal and the secure decryption environment.
Where a PCI-listed validated P2PE solution is used correctly, it can potentially reduce the merchant's PCI DSS scope.
However, merchants should confirm:
Do not assume that because a provider uses the word “encrypted”, the implementation automatically qualifies as a PCI-listed P2PE solution.
Potentially.
Some EPOS platforms support several payment providers or integration partners.
Others have a narrower list.
This can materially affect future provider choice.
A business selecting an EPOS platform should therefore ask:
“Which payment providers can we use today?”
and:
“What happens if we want to change acquiring provider in two years?”
This can be particularly important for growing businesses because locking the till and payment provider too tightly together can reduce commercial flexibility later.
Not automatically.
An EPOS provider may have:
Those options may be excellent.
But businesses should still understand:
Convenience and commercial competitiveness are not necessarily the same thing.
A provider migration should include a plan for historic transactions.
Businesses may still need the old system for:
Do not close the old provider before establishing how historic refunds and transaction records will be handled.
Before full rollout, test more than a basic sale.
The test plan should consider:
A successful £1 test transaction does not prove the whole payment environment is ready.
Before choosing or changing provider, establish:
Rather than comparing terminals in isolation, Merchant Advice Service would look at six areas.
Does the payment provider have a proven, supported integration with the merchant's current EPOS system?
Does the setup support the way the business actually trades, including tills, tables, locations, refunds and staff?
How do the terminal, connector, EPOS, network and payment provider communicate?
How do transaction costs, terminal costs, integration costs and contracts compare?
What happens if the internet, EPOS integration or terminal stops working?
Can the business change provider, add locations or alter payment architecture without replacing its entire EPOS estate?
The best integrated card machine is not simply the terminal that works with your EPOS today. It is the payment architecture that works today without unnecessarily restricting your options tomorrow.
Merchant Advice Service helps businesses compare card-payment providers based on the wider payment requirement rather than terminal hardware alone.
When reviewing an integrated payment setup, we may consider:
Our role is to help establish which payment-provider options fit the complete business requirement before the merchant commits to new terminals or contracts.
Explore payment providers through The Payments Directory® or read How Merchant Advice Service Works.
The Payment Systems Regulator found that POS-terminal contracts could create barriers to merchants switching card-acquiring provider and introduced measures designed to improve merchant flexibility.
PSR — Note to Point-of-Sale Terminal Providers
The PSR's market review identified POS-terminal contracts, card-acquiring contracts and difficulty comparing providers as factors restricting merchants' willingness and ability to search and switch.
PSR Card-Acquiring Market Review — Final Report
PCI SSC publishes the current PCI DSS requirements and standards relevant to merchant payment environments.
Merchant Advice Service is an independent payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.
MAS may receive commission or a referral fee from some payment providers where a business chooses to proceed following an introduction. This does not determine the factual information or provider-selection principles included in this guide.
Card-machine and EPOS compatibility varies by provider, terminal model, software version, integration, acquiring arrangement and individual merchant setup.
A terminal supporting a particular card type or payment method does not mean that it automatically integrates with every EPOS or business-management platform.
Businesses should obtain written confirmation of compatibility from the relevant payment and EPOS providers before entering a new contract or beginning a migration.
Changing payment architecture can affect PCI DSS responsibilities. Formal PCI DSS scope and validation requirements should be confirmed with the relevant acquiring provider or appropriately qualified PCI professional.
References to integration benefits are general and do not guarantee reduced errors, lower costs or operational savings for an individual merchant.
Provider integrations, terminal models, software compatibility, contracts and technical capabilities can change.
Merchant Advice Service does not guarantee provider acceptance or technical compatibility.
Integration and regulatory information last checked: 27 August 2026
This guide provides general payments information and should not be treated as technical, legal, regulatory or PCI compliance advice.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.