Merchant Accounts for Vets: Card Payments, Pet Insurance & Veterinary Software

Veterinary Payments: The Quick Answer

Veterinary practices often need payment systems that can cope with routine consultations, unexpected emergency bills, insured animals, deposits for procedures, remote collections and higher-value treatment.

The payment journey can also be more complicated than it first appears.

One pet owner may pay the full bill at reception and claim the cost back from their insurer. Another may have an insurance claim handled directly with the practice but still need to pay an excess or an amount that is not covered. Another may need to pay a deposit before surgery or settle an outstanding balance through a payment link after leaving the practice.

A veterinary payment setup may therefore need to support:

• face-to-face card payments;
• emergency and out-of-hours payments;
• higher-value treatment bills;
• deposits before surgery or procedures;
• pet-insurance related balances;
• payment links;
• telephone and MOTO payments;
• online payments;
• recurring pet health plans;
• third-party finance where offered;
• practice-management software integration;
• multi-site reporting;
• refunds;
• reconciliation; and
• fast and reliable settlement.

For this reason, veterinary practices should normally compare the complete payment workflow rather than simply choosing the provider advertising the lowest transaction percentage.

Find Your New Processor

Who Is This Veterinary Payments Guide For?

This guide is designed for UK veterinary businesses including:

• independent veterinary practices;
• small-animal vets;
• large-animal practices;
• mixed veterinary practices;
• specialist and referral centres;
• emergency and out-of-hours providers;
• veterinary hospitals;
• mobile vets;
• multi-site veterinary groups;
• practices operating pet health plans;
• practices offering or introducing payment finance; and
• veterinary businesses reviewing an existing merchant account.

The payment requirements of these businesses can be very different.

A small first-opinion practice taking mostly routine consultation payments may need a relatively straightforward terminal setup.

A referral hospital undertaking complex surgery may process much larger transactions, handle more insurance claims and require deposits before expensive procedures.

Veterinary practices have a distinct payment model because of emergency treatment, pet insurance, deposits and recurring health plans. For a broader comparison of payments across healthcare sectors, see our Healthcare Payment Solutions UK guide.

Why Veterinary Payments Are Different

Veterinary payments often happen at a difficult point for the customer.

A pet owner may arrive expecting the cost of a routine consultation but leave facing diagnostic tests, medication, surgery or emergency treatment costing substantially more.

The decision to proceed with treatment can therefore create an immediate payment requirement that the owner had not planned for.

A veterinary practice might need to collect:

• a £50–£100 routine charge;
• a larger diagnostic bill;
• a treatment deposit;
• a payment for emergency care;
• an insurance excess;
• an uninsured portion of a claim;
• a balance following treatment;
• regular payments for a health plan; or
• several thousand pounds for surgery or specialist treatment.

The payment technology needs to cope with this variation while keeping the process as straightforward as possible for reception staff and pet owners.

Card Machines for Veterinary Practices

For most veterinary practices, the reception desk remains the main point of payment collection.

A suitable card machine should make it easy to take debit cards, credit cards, contactless transactions and supported digital wallets.

However, practices should look beyond whether the terminal can simply process a card.

Consider:

• how many terminals are required;
• whether portable terminals are useful;
• whether terminals are needed in consulting or discharge areas;
• how quickly payments settle;
• whether transactions integrate with veterinary software;
• how refunds are controlled;
• how transactions are reconciled;
• whether multiple sites require separate reporting; and
• what backup is available if connectivity fails.

Veterinary reception areas can become extremely busy, particularly during peak appointment times and emergencies, so terminal reliability and ease of use can be just as important as transaction cost.

Emergency and Out-of-Hours Veterinary Payments

Emergency veterinary treatment creates one of the most distinctive payment situations in healthcare.

The client may be making decisions under pressure and the final treatment cost may be difficult to know when the animal first arrives.

An out-of-hours provider might therefore need to:

• take an initial consultation fee;
• collect a deposit before admitting the animal;
• take further payment if treatment escalates;
• accept a higher-value card transaction;
• contact someone else who is paying on the owner's behalf;
• send a remote payment link; or
• collect the final balance when the animal is discharged.

The payment setup should make these journeys possible without creating unnecessary administrative delays.

Treatment Estimates and Payment Transparency

Veterinary businesses should make treatment costs as clear as reasonably possible before payment is collected.

This is particularly important where treatment may become expensive or where additional diagnostics and procedures could materially increase the original estimate.

The Competition and Markets Authority concluded a major investigation into the UK veterinary sector in 2026 and identified concerns around areas including price transparency and the ability of pet owners to compare costs.

The CMA's package of reforms includes measures intended to improve pricing information and transparency across the veterinary market.

Practices should follow the latest CMA and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons guidance as these measures are implemented.

From a payment perspective, better pricing information can also reduce:

• surprise at checkout;
• billing disputes;
• confusion over deposits;
• unexpected outstanding balances; and
• potential card-payment complaints.

Pet Insurance and Veterinary Payments

Pet insurance is a major part of the veterinary payment environment.

Association of British Insurers data shows that participating insurers paid a record £1.23 billion in pet-insurance claims during 2024, with around 1.8 million claims notified.

That does not mean every insured veterinary invoice is paid directly to the practice.

The payment journey can vary depending on:

• the insurer;
• the insurance policy;
• the veterinary practice's claims process;
• whether the practice agrees to submit a direct claim;
• the treatment being provided;
• the client's excess;
• policy limits; and
• items excluded from cover.

This creates two broad payment journeys.

The owner pays and claims from the insurer

In some cases the pet owner pays the veterinary invoice and subsequently seeks reimbursement from their insurer.

The veterinary practice therefore receives the full client payment in the same way as an uninsured bill.

The practice participates in an insurance claim

In other situations the practice may help process the claim or receive some payment in connection with the insurance settlement.

The client may still need to pay:

• their policy excess;
• a percentage contribution;
• items excluded by the policy;
• treatment above a policy limit;
• administrative charges where applicable; or
• another remaining balance.

This means veterinary accounts teams may need to reconcile insurer-related income and owner payments against the same treatment invoice.

Pet Insurance Does Not Eliminate the Need for Flexible Payments

Even where an animal is insured, the owner may still need to make a card payment.

For example:

A £3,000 veterinary invoice might ultimately involve:

• an insurer contribution;
• a policy excess paid by the owner;
• another portion outside the policy terms; and
• a remaining balance to be settled separately.

The practice therefore needs a way to identify what has already been paid, who paid it and what remains outstanding.

This becomes particularly important for referral centres and practices dealing with higher-value cases.

Veterinary Practice Software and Pet Insurance Claims

Modern veterinary practice-management systems can connect clinical, billing, insurance and payment workflows.

Software may support:

• patient and client records;
• appointment booking;
• treatment estimates;
• invoicing;
• insurance claims;
• payment collection;
• deposits;
• transaction reporting;
• stock and medicines;
• pet health plans; and
• accounting integrations.

This means the payment provider should not always be selected independently from the practice software.

ezyVet and Integrated Veterinary Payments

ezyVet is one example of a veterinary practice-management platform that supports integrated payment and insurance workflows.

Its UK product currently promotes integrated payment terminals as a way to reduce manual payment processing.

Its integration ecosystem also includes payment, insurance, finance, accounting and other veterinary technology providers.

The principle is important for any practice using ezyVet or another veterinary PMS:

check which payment providers and functions are supported before changing merchant account.

Questions to ask include:

• Which terminal providers integrate with the PMS?
• Can payment amounts be passed directly to the terminal?
• Are payments automatically recorded against invoices?
• Can payment links be generated?
• How are deposits recorded?
• How are insurance-related payments reconciled?
• Can stored payment credentials be used?
• What happens to existing functionality if we switch processor?

RoboVet, RxWorks and Integrated Payments

UK veterinary practices may also use Covetrus systems including RoboVet and RxWorks.

Covetrus currently promotes integrated payment functionality within its UK veterinary software environment.

Its connected-partner platform includes payment-processing integrations that can allow transactions to be written back to the practice-management system.

RxWorks also currently supports sending customers payment URLs through email or SMS.

This creates the same switching consideration:

A replacement merchant provider may offer a lower percentage rate but still create a worse overall result if staff lose an integration and have to manually enter and reconcile every transaction.

Find Your New Processor

Integrated Payments Can Reduce Double Keying

Without integration, a typical payment might involve:

1. the veterinary invoice showing £485;
2. the receptionist manually entering £485 into the terminal;
3. the client making payment;
4. the receptionist marking the invoice as paid; and
5. the transaction later being reconciled against the merchant settlement.

Manual workflows can create:

• incorrect payment amounts;
• incorrect patient or client allocation;
• duplicate entry;
• missed payments;
• reconciliation differences; and
• additional administration.

Where the veterinary software and payment technology are integrated, some of these steps can potentially be automated.

Our guide to integrated payment solutions explains the wider principles.

Deposits Before Veterinary Surgery and Procedures

Veterinary practices may ask for a deposit before more expensive treatment or procedures.

This may be particularly relevant to:

• surgery;
• specialist procedures;
• dental treatment;
• diagnostic imaging;
• referral work;
• hospital admission;
• planned treatment requiring significant resources; and
• other higher-value appointments.

A deposit can help establish that the client intends to proceed and reduce the practice's financial exposure.

The practice should clearly explain:

• how much the deposit is;
• what treatment it relates to;
• when it is due;
• whether it is refundable;
• how it will be applied against the final bill;
• what happens if the treatment plan changes; and
• what happens if the procedure is cancelled.

Payment Links for Veterinary Practices

Payment links can be particularly useful in veterinary practices.

A secure link can be sent by text message or email so the client can make payment without physically returning to the practice.

Veterinary payment links can be used for:

• procedure deposits;
• outstanding invoices;
• insurance excesses;
• uninsured balances;
• follow-up treatment;
• remote consultations;
• prescription or medication payments where appropriate;
• payments by another family member; and
• balances after discharge.

They can also be useful where someone other than the person attending the practice is paying the bill.

Payment Links Can Help With Remote Collections

Historically, a practice chasing an outstanding balance might ask the client to call reception and provide their card details.

A payment link creates another option.

The practice can send the payment request and allow the customer to enter their own card information into the provider's secure payment page.

This may reduce:

• telephone handling;
• manual card entry;
• time spent chasing payments;
• payment delays; and
• some of the PCI DSS exposure associated with staff handling card details directly.

Telephone Payments and MOTO for Vets

Telephone payments can still be important for veterinary businesses.

Examples include:

• a client paying a deposit before surgery;
• someone settling an outstanding bill;
• a family member paying on behalf of the owner;
• a client arranging an emergency appointment;
• a remote customer paying for treatment; or
• a client unable to use a digital payment link.

Where card details are taken over the telephone, the transaction may be processed through an approved MOTO or virtual-terminal facility.

Practices should compare:

• MOTO pricing;
• PCI DSS responsibilities;
• staff permissions;
• fraud controls;
• reporting;
• refund functionality; and
• whether payment links could replace some telephone transactions.

High-Value Veterinary Bills

Veterinary practices can process substantial transactions, particularly for emergency, surgical and specialist treatment.

The ABI's latest published claims data illustrates the scale some veterinary treatment can reach, with individual complex cases potentially costing thousands or tens of thousands of pounds.

A veterinary merchant account application should therefore accurately explain:

• average transaction value;
• maximum transaction value;
• monthly card turnover;
• how frequently larger transactions occur;
• types of treatment generating high-value payments;
• whether payment is collected before or after treatment;
• refund levels; and
• chargeback history.

A provider that expects mostly £100–£200 routine transactions should not be assumed to support repeated payments worth several thousand pounds without the genuine processing profile being disclosed.

Are Veterinary Practices High Risk Merchants?

Veterinary practices are not automatically considered high-risk merchants by every payment provider.

Most established veterinary practices may be relatively conventional service businesses from an acquiring perspective.

However, individual underwriting can still depend on factors such as:

• average and maximum transaction values;
• business history;
• card turnover;
• advance payments;
• future-delivery exposure;
• chargebacks;
• refund levels;
• remote payments;
• finance arrangements;
• products sold;
• multiple locations; and
• previous processing history.

Our guide to merchant account underwriting explains the wider approval process.

Pet Health Plans and Recurring Payments

Many veterinary practices offer pet health or wellness plans.

These can allow owners to pay regularly for an agreed package of routine preventative services or benefits.

A pet health plan should not automatically be treated as the same thing as pet insurance or consumer finance. The exact commercial arrangement matters.

Payment collection might use:

• Direct Debit;
• recurring card payments;
• stored payment credentials; or
• another recurring billing arrangement.

Where recurring cards are used, practices should understand:

• how customer authority is obtained;
• how card credentials are tokenised;
• how failed payments are handled;
• how expired cards are updated;
• how cancellations work;
• how refunds are managed;
• how payments appear within the PMS; and
• whether tokens can be migrated if the practice later switches payment provider.

Pet Health Plans Are Not the Same as Pet Insurance

This distinction should be clear to clients.

A veterinary health plan typically relates to specified routine services or benefits provided by the practice.

Pet insurance is an insurance contract designed to cover eligible veterinary costs under the policy terms.

A practice offering both should avoid creating confusion between the two payment propositions.

Veterinary Payment Plans and Patient Finance

Large unexpected veterinary bills can create affordability issues for pet owners.

Some veterinary businesses therefore introduce customers to third-party finance providers.

However, consumer finance is not the same as ordinary card processing.

A merchant account allows the practice to accept a payment.

A finance arrangement involves credit being provided to the customer.

The Financial Conduct Authority has specific consumer-credit guidance for vets and dentists.

Where a veterinary business introduces customers to a third-party finance provider, it may require appropriate consumer-credit permissions depending on the precise activity and product involved.

The FCA indicates that vets introducing customers to third-party finance for the services they provide may fall within limited-permission secondary credit broking.

Veterinary Finance and Buy Now Pay Later

Deferred Payment Credit, commonly associated with Buy Now Pay Later, came into FCA regulation for lenders on 15 July 2026.

Veterinary businesses should therefore avoid assuming that every instalment or finance proposition operates under the same regulatory framework.

Before introducing a payment-finance product, establish:

• who the lender is;
• whether the lender is appropriately authorised;
• whether the practice is acting as a credit broker;
• what permissions or exemptions apply;
• how the product is presented to customers;
• whether interest or charges apply;
• how complaints are handled; and
• how refunds work if treatment changes.

The payment processor does not determine the practice's consumer-credit regulatory obligations.

Veterinary businesses should confirm their individual position with the FCA or an appropriately qualified adviser.

Staged Payments for Veterinary Treatment

Taking more than one card payment does not automatically mean the practice is providing formal finance.

For example, a treatment journey may involve:

• a deposit before treatment;
• a further payment when surgery takes place; and
• the remaining balance when the animal is discharged.

The practice should clearly document:

• what each payment relates to;
• when payment becomes due;
• whether the customer actively authorises each transaction;
• what happens if treatment changes;
• what happens if the final bill is lower than estimated; and
• how refunds or credits are calculated.

If the practice allows payment to be deferred or provides credit, the relevant consumer-credit position should be considered separately.

Refunds and Veterinary Treatment Changes

Veterinary treatment can change quickly.

A planned procedure may be cancelled, diagnostics may show that a different course of treatment is required or an estimated treatment plan may change.

The payment system should therefore make it straightforward to process:

• deposit refunds;
• partial refunds;
• full refunds;
• account credits; and
• adjustments to an existing invoice.

Practices should also consider who is authorised to process refunds, particularly for larger transactions.

Chargebacks and Veterinary Payments

A cardholder can potentially dispute a veterinary payment through their card issuer.

This can be particularly challenging where the dispute relates to an expensive or emotionally difficult course of treatment.

Useful payment records may include:

• the treatment estimate;
• invoice;
• payment receipt;
• evidence that the cardholder authorised the transaction;
• deposit and cancellation terms;
• refund records; and
• relevant payment-related correspondence.

Clinical information should not automatically be disclosed simply because a card dispute exists. Veterinary practices should consider appropriate confidentiality and data-handling requirements.

Our chargeback guide explains the wider card-dispute process.

Mobile Vets and Payments Away From the Practice

Not every veterinary transaction takes place at a fixed surgery.

Mobile vets, large-animal vets and home-visit services may need to accept payment at another location.

Options can include:

• mobile card terminals;
• portable terminals using cellular connectivity;
• payment links;
• online payment requests;
• telephone payments; and
• invoices issued after the visit.

Connectivity should be considered carefully where vets regularly work in rural areas or locations with weak mobile coverage.

Multi-Site Veterinary Groups

Larger veterinary groups can have significantly more complex payment requirements.

A group may operate:

• first-opinion practices;
• referral centres;
• veterinary hospitals;
• out-of-hours sites;
• specialist centres; and
• mobile services.

Payments may therefore need to be managed across many locations and transaction types.

Questions to consider include:

• Does every practice operate under the same legal entity?
• Should different sites have separate merchant IDs?
• Can the group negotiate pricing centrally?
• Can transactions be viewed by location?
• Can finance teams consolidate reporting?
• How are refunds controlled?
• Does every site use the same practice-management software?
• Can new practices be onboarded quickly?
• Can different payment integrations coexist?
• How are online payments routed?
• How are insurer and owner payments reconciled?

At this scale, merchant services become part of the group's wider technology and finance architecture rather than simply a card-machine contract.

Higher-Volume Veterinary Groups Should Review Payment Pricing Differently

An established veterinary group processing substantial card turnover should consider the full merchant-cost structure.

This may include:

• blended pricing;
• Interchange++;
• fixed transaction charges;
• terminal rental;
• gateway fees;
• MOTO costs;
• payment-link charges;
• refund fees;
• chargeback fees;
• authorisation fees;
• PCI-related charges;
• commercial-card costs;
• settlement periods; and
• integration fees.

The most useful comparison for an established veterinary business is often based on real merchant statements and actual transaction mix rather than headline rates.

Settlement Times and Veterinary Cash Flow

Settlement determines when processed card funds reach the veterinary practice's bank account.

This can become commercially important where the practice has substantial outgoing costs including:

• staff salaries;
• medicines;
• laboratory costs;
• diagnostic services;
• equipment;
• referral costs;
• property expenses;
• stock; and
• other clinical expenditure.

Practices processing high volumes of self-pay card transactions should therefore compare both:

how much does the transaction cost + when does the money arrive?

Switching Merchant Account Provider as a Veterinary Practice

Changing processor may be straightforward for a practice using standalone card machines.

It becomes more complicated once the processor is connected to the practice-management environment.

Before switching, map:

• reception terminals;
• portable terminals;
• payment links;
• virtual terminals;
• practice-management software;
• pet health plans;
• stored payment credentials;
• recurring transactions;
• online booking;
• insurance workflows;
• finance systems;
• accounting integrations;
• refunds; and
• reporting.

Then determine which functions depend on the current processor.

Check Veterinary Software Before Switching Payment Provider

This is particularly important for practices using integrated platforms such as ezyVet, RoboVet, RxWorks, Provet Cloud or other veterinary-management systems.

Before cancelling anything, ask:

• Which payment processors are currently integrated?
• Can we use another terminal provider?
• Will payment amounts still feed automatically into the PMS?
• Can we keep payment links?
• Will deposits still work?
• What happens to stored payment credentials?
• Can recurring payment tokens be migrated?
• Does a different processor require new hardware?
• Will our insurance workflow be affected?
• Will reconciliation become manual?

A cheaper provider can become more expensive operationally if changing removes important integration functionality.

Our merchant-services switching guide covers the wider migration process.

Find Your New Processor

What Should Veterinary Practices Compare?

What Information Should a Vet Provide When Comparing Merchant Accounts?

A useful starting point includes:

• practice name;
• website;
• legal entity;
• type of veterinary practice;
• number of locations;
• monthly and annual card turnover;
• number of transactions;
• average transaction value;
• maximum transaction value;
• number of card terminals;
• percentage of face-to-face transactions;
• percentage of remote payments;
• payment-link requirements;
• MOTO requirements;
• practice-management software;
• pet health-plan requirements;
• finance arrangements;
• existing payment provider;
• recent merchant statements where available;
• existing settlement period;
• contract end date; and
• main reason for reviewing the payment arrangement.

This gives potential providers a clearer understanding of the practice than simply requesting a quote for “a veterinary surgery”.

Merchant Advice Service View

Veterinary businesses are a good example of why the best payment provider cannot be identified from a generic card-processing comparison table.

A small first-opinion vet taking mostly routine payments at reception has very different requirements from a 24-hour referral hospital dealing with insured animals, high-value surgery, deposits and large emergency bills.

A practice running ezyVet or RoboVet with integrated payments also has different switching requirements from one using completely standalone terminals.

The starting point should be to understand:

how clients pay + how pet insurance affects the balance + typical and maximum bills + which practice software is used + whether deposits or health plans are required + how transactions are reconciled.

Once those requirements are clear, providers can be compared on a meaningful basis.

How Merchant Advice Service Helps Veterinary Practices

Merchant Advice Service is an independent UK payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.

We can help veterinary businesses understand their payment requirements and identify potential provider routes based on the way the practice operates.

This can include:

• new veterinary merchant accounts;
• card terminals;
• payment links;
• remote collections;
• MOTO;
• higher-value transactions;
• practice-management integrations;
• multi-site veterinary groups;
• recurring-payment requirements;
• reviewing merchant statements;
• switching existing providers;
• settlement requirements;
• previous payment-processing issues; and
• more complex veterinary payment setups.

The aim is to understand the veterinary business first rather than submitting applications indiscriminately.

Final underwriting, acceptance, pricing and commercial terms remain with the relevant payment provider.

Find Your New Processor

Sources and Reference Organisations

• Competition and Markets Authority – veterinary services market investigation and implementation
• Competition and Markets Authority – veterinary market reforms and price transparency
• Association of British Insurers – UK pet-insurance claims data
• Financial Conduct Authority – consumer-credit guidance for vets and dentists
• Financial Conduct Authority – Deferred Payment Credit regulation
• ezyVet – UK veterinary software and integrated payments
• ezyVet – invoicing, payments and pet-insurance integrations
• Covetrus RoboVet – UK veterinary practice management and integrated payments
• Covetrus RxWorks – online payments and veterinary software integration
• Provet Cloud – veterinary practice software and payment integrations

Editorial disclosure: Veterinary software companies, payment providers, insurers and finance products are referenced to explain how veterinary payment workflows can operate. Inclusion does not constitute a recommendation or ranking. Provider integrations, functionality, pricing and acceptance criteria can change and should be confirmed directly before making a commercial decision.

This guide provides general payment-processing information. It does not constitute veterinary, insurance, consumer-credit, legal or regulatory advice. Veterinary businesses offering or introducing customer finance should confirm the regulatory requirements that apply to their individual arrangement.