Merchant Account Fees Explained
Published - 11 May 2023
Revised - 03 August 2026


Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
The price of accepting a card payment is rarely explained by one percentage.
A provider might advertise:
Card processing from 0.6%
Another might quote:
1.2% with no monthly fee
A larger merchant may receive an offer described as:
Interchange plus 0.35% and 5p
None of those figures tells the business its complete payment cost.
The final amount can also be affected by:
A business processing £250,000 per month could have a headline transaction charge of £3,250 but pay another £675 through authorisation, gateway, account and compliance-related charges.
Its real cost would therefore be:
£3,925, equivalent to 1.57% of card turnover
This guide explains what UK merchant account fees mean, which charges may be negotiable and how to calculate the actual cost of accepting payments.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.
Last reviewed: August 2026
Merchant account fees are the charges a business pays to accept, process and settle card payments.
The main merchant service charge ordinarily includes:
The Payment Systems Regulator describes the merchant service charge as the total amount paid to the acquirer for card-acquiring services. It comprises interchange, scheme fees and acquirer net revenue, which includes the acquirer’s other costs and margin.
However, the merchant service charge may not represent the business’s full payment cost.
A merchant may also pay separately for:
The most useful figure is therefore not always the advertised card rate.
It is:
Total payment-related charges ÷ total card sales
This produces the business’s effective processing rate.
In a typical four-party card transaction, the main participants are:
The card scheme connects the issuer and acquirer and sets rules for participating in the payment system.
From the merchant’s perspective, the simplified fee structure is:
Interchange
Paid by the acquirer to the customer’s card issuer.
↓
Scheme and processing fees
Paid for access to and use of the card network and related processing services.
↓
Acquirer costs and margin
The provider’s cost of delivering acquiring services plus its commercial margin.
↓
Additional merchant services
Gateway, terminals, reporting, fraud tools and other services that may be invoiced separately.
Interchange does not normally go to Visa or Mastercard. It is generally paid by the merchant’s acquirer to the cardholder’s issuer.
These two figures are not necessarily the same.
This is the core amount charged for card-acquiring services.
It may appear as:
This includes the merchant service charge plus other payment-related charges.
For example:
| Cost | Monthly amount |
|---|---|
| Merchant service charge | £3,250 |
| Authorisation charges | £420 |
| Gateway and reporting | £120 |
| Monthly account fee | £45 |
| PCI administration | £30 |
| Terminal or equipment charges | £60 |
| Total payment cost | £3,925 |
A merchant comparing only the £3,250 transaction charge would overlook more than 17% of its payment cost in this example.
Use:
Total payment cost ÷ total card sales × 100
Monthly card sales: £250,000
Total payment-related charges: £3,925
The calculation is:
£3,925 ÷ £250,000 × 100 = 1.57%
The business’s effective processing rate is therefore:
1.57%
This is usually a more useful starting point than comparing one headline percentage.
Include charges connected with accepting and processing the payments being reviewed.
These may include:
Keep one-off items separate, such as:
Showing recurring and one-off costs separately prevents one unusual charge from distorting the normal monthly rate.
A single effective rate can hide useful information.
Calculate:
All payment costs divided by all card turnover.
Online payment costs divided by online card turnover.
Terminal-related payment costs divided by card-present turnover.
International-card costs divided by international-card turnover.
Total payment cost divided by the number of successful payments.
These calculations can reveal that one channel or customer group is responsible for a disproportionate amount of the total cost.
Interchange is generally paid by the merchant’s acquirer to the customer’s card issuer when a card payment is made.
The acquirer ordinarily incorporates that cost into the price charged to the merchant.
Interchange can vary according to factors such as:
The merchant does not normally negotiate an individual interchange rate directly with the customer’s bank.
However, the merchant can negotiate:
Under the current UK Interchange Fee Regulation, certain consumer-card transactions are capped where the merchant, acquirer and card issuer are all located within the UK.
Where the caps apply, they currently limit interchange to:
Those caps apply to interchange, not the complete merchant service charge. A provider can therefore charge the merchant more than 0.2% or 0.3% once scheme costs, acquiring services, processing and margin are included.
The domestic caps do not automatically apply to:
Because the 0.2% figure is an interchange cap, not a cap on the merchant’s complete price.
The merchant may also pay:
A quotation of:
0.6% plus 5p
does not necessarily breach the interchange cap.
The provider is charging for more than interchange.
Business, corporate and purchasing cards can carry different costs from personal consumer cards.
They may be used for:
The UK domestic consumer interchange caps do not apply to commercial cards in the same way as eligible consumer cards.
A merchant with a high proportion of business customers should therefore identify:
A quote based mainly on UK consumer cards may not accurately predict the cost of a business-to-business transaction mix.
A card issued outside the UK may attract different interchange, scheme and cross-border costs.
The domestic UK interchange caps apply where the merchant, acquirer and issuer are all within the UK. Cross-border transactions involving an issuer or acquirer outside the UK are outside those domestic caps.
This can matter significantly for merchants in:
Ask a provider to price the business using its actual issuer-country mix rather than assuming every transaction involves a UK-issued consumer card.
Card scheme fees are charged in connection with participating in and using a card payment system.
Processing fees can relate to services such as:
The merchant may not see each underlying fee individually.
Depending on the pricing arrangement, the acquirer may:
The PSR’s 2025 review found that Mastercard and Visa had increased their core scheme and processing fees to acquirers by at least 25% since 2017, costing UK businesses at least £170 million more each year. The regulator also identified insufficiently clear fee information as a source of cost for acquirers and merchants.
This does not mean every merchant’s individual bill increased by exactly 25%.
The effect depends on:
The underlying fee is generally set by the scheme rather than negotiated directly between an individual merchant and Visa or Mastercard.
However, the merchant can still examine:
Under IC++ pricing, a merchant may see scheme charges more distinctly.
Under blended pricing, the provider may combine several cost components into one rate.
The acquirer margin is the commercial amount retained by the provider after accounting for its underlying costs.
It may cover:
The margin may be expressed as:
This is often one of the more negotiable parts of a merchant account.
The amount offered can depend on:
A quotation described as:
Interchange plus
still contains a provider margin.
For example:
Interchange + 0.35% + 5p
The 0.35% and 5p are part of the provider’s commercial pricing.
There may also be:
Ask precisely what the word plus includes.
An authorisation occurs when a payment request is sent for approval.
A provider may charge a fixed amount for each authorisation attempt.
This can matter where the business has:
Authorisation charge: 4p
Monthly authorisation attempts: 50,000
Monthly authorisation cost:
50,000 × £0.04 = £2,000
This can be significant even where the percentage card rate looks competitive.
Check whether the fixed fee applies to:
A merchant with 40,000 completed payments but 55,000 authorisation attempts may be charged on 55,000 events rather than 40,000 sales.
This is particularly relevant for recurring and subscription businesses.
A payment gateway sends payment information between the merchant’s checkout and the relevant payment-processing parties.
Gateway pricing can include:
Some providers bundle gateway and acquiring into one price.
Others invoice them separately.
A merchant changing acquirer may not necessarily need to replace its gateway, depending on:
Suppose a merchant pays:
The gateway cost is:
£25 + £600 = £625 per month
A quote showing only the acquiring percentage would miss that £625.
A card-present merchant may pay for:
The terminal agreement may be separate from the merchant-acquiring agreement.
The PSR’s card-acquiring remedies require certain major providers to use summary information boxes and trigger messages and limit relevant point-of-sale terminal lease and rental contracts to a maximum initial duration of 18 months, followed by a rolling monthly arrangement.
Before switching provider, check both:
Ending one does not necessarily end the other.
A provider may charge a recurring fee for:
A low monthly charge may be insignificant for a large merchant.
For a small or seasonal merchant, it can materially increase the effective rate.
Monthly card sales: £2,000
Monthly account and terminal fees: £40
Before transaction charges, the fixed cost already represents:
£40 ÷ £2,000 × 100 = 2%
A minimum monthly charge means the merchant must generate at least a specified amount in qualifying transaction fees.
Suppose:
Minimum service charge: £30
Qualifying transaction charges generated: £18
The provider may charge an additional:
£12
to reach the £30 minimum.
Check which charges count towards the minimum.
Gateway, terminal and PCI fees may sit outside it.
PCI DSS is the security standard applying to organisations involved in storing, processing or transmitting payment-account data.
Outsourcing payment processing can substantially reduce the merchant’s technical scope, but it does not automatically remove every responsibility. Merchants still need to understand their validation obligations and the responsibilities shared with their payment providers.
A provider may charge:
These are provider charges rather than fines imposed directly by the PCI Security Standards Council.
The PCI Council says it does not manage individual compliance programmes or impose consequences for non-compliance. Payment brands and other organisations may operate their own compliance programmes and contractual consequences.
Ask whether the charge includes:
Also ask:
A fee labelled PCI is not automatically unavoidable in every provider contract.
Refund pricing varies.
The merchant may encounter:
Ask:
A provider quoting a low transaction rate can still be expensive for a business with a high refund frequency.
A chargeback can involve two separate financial effects:
The provider may also apply:
The agreement should explain whether an administration fee applies:
Do not confuse a chargeback fee with the disputed transaction value.
International processing can introduce several different charges:
Ask the provider to separate:
Where the card was issued.
The currency the customer used.
The currency submitted into the payment system.
The currency paid into the merchant bank account.
A customer can use a foreign-issued card while paying in GBP.
That may still attract international-card costs even though no customer-facing currency conversion occurred.
A merchant accepting several currencies should establish:
A transaction fee of 1% can be overshadowed by a significant conversion margin.
The merchant should compare:
Net GBP or settlement currency actually received
rather than only the card-processing percentage.
American Express can operate differently from the four-party model commonly associated with Visa and Mastercard.
A merchant might receive:
Do not assume that a Visa or Mastercard quote automatically includes:
Ask which card brands are included and how each is priced.
Apple Pay and Google Pay normally use an underlying payment credential, such as a debit or credit card.
The cost to the merchant can therefore depend on:
Do not assume every wallet payment has:
Review how wallet transactions appear in the provider’s reporting.
Providers may offer additional services such as:
An optional service is not necessarily poor value.
A fraud tool costing £500 per month could be worthwhile if it prevents materially greater fraud losses.
The correct question is:
What commercial result does this service produce?
A rolling reserve is normally retained money rather than an ordinary processing charge.
A settlement delay changes when the business receives eligible funds.
Neither should automatically be added to the fee total as though it were a permanent expense.
However, both can create a real working-capital cost.
For example:
Monthly card processing: £500,000
Rolling reserve: 10%
New amount retained: £50,000
The business may need to replace that working capital using:
That funding has a commercial cost even if the reserve is ultimately released.
See the MAS guides to:
Providers do not all present their charges in the same way.
The main models include:
The provider charges one rate for a broad group of payments.
For example:
1.2% + 10p per transaction
The provider charges different rates for categories such as:
For example:
| Card category | Illustrative rate |
|---|---|
| UK consumer debit | Quoted rate |
| UK consumer credit | Quoted rate |
| Commercial card | Quoted rate |
| International card | Quoted rate |
This provides more detail than one flat rate but can still combine interchange, scheme costs and provider margin.
The merchant pays:
Underlying interchange + provider margin
The quote might appear as:
Interchange + 0.35% + 4p
Ask whether scheme and processing fees are:
The name IC+ is not always presented identically by every provider.
IC++ generally separates:
This can provide greater visibility.
However, it can also make statements more complicated because the underlying cost differs between transaction categories.
IC++ is not automatically cheaper.
The result depends on:
See the MAS guide to when high-turnover businesses should consider IC+ or IC++ pricing.
There is no universally best model.
The correct comparison is not:
Blended is expensive and IC++ is cheap.
It is:
What would each model have cost using the same transactions?
The most reliable comparison applies the proposed pricing to a representative historic transaction file.
For example, use three to twelve months of:
Then calculate:
A generic quote based only on monthly turnover can be inaccurate where the merchant has an unusual card mix.
Consider two providers.
Which is cheaper depends partly on:
Transaction value: £5
Provider B is cheaper for this individual low-value transaction despite having the higher percentage.
Transaction value: £1,000
Provider A is cheaper for this high-value transaction.
This is why average transaction value matters.
Calculate:
Total payment cost ÷ successful transactions
Total payment cost: £3,925
Successful payments: 25,000
The average cost is:
£3,925 ÷ 25,000 = 15.7p per successful payment
This is useful for:
A single order can involve several payment events.
For example:
The merchant may therefore have more billable payment events than customer orders.
For subscription businesses, one customer can generate:
The payment-cost model should reflect the complete lifecycle.
Depending on the provider, an unsuccessful payment may still generate:
A low headline rate does not compensate for a payment setup with unnecessarily poor authorisation performance.
The merchant should consider:
The most useful commercial measure may be:
Total payment cost per £1 of successfully collected revenue
rather than cost per attempted payment.
Providers may consider:
Two businesses processing the same monthly amount can therefore receive different terms.
The total turnover is identical.
The underlying costs, risk and commercial requirements are not.
The answer depends on the provider and contract.
| Fee or term | Negotiation potential |
|---|---|
| Interchange set by the card system | Not normally negotiated directly by merchant |
| Scheme-set fees | Not normally negotiated directly by merchant |
| Acquirer markup | Often commercially negotiable |
| Fixed transaction fee | Potentially negotiable |
| Authorisation charge | Potentially negotiable |
| Gateway price | Potentially negotiable |
| Monthly account fee | Potentially negotiable |
| Monthly minimum | Potentially negotiable |
| Terminal rental | Potentially negotiable |
| PCI administration fee | Potentially negotiable |
| Refund fee | Potentially negotiable |
| Chargeback administration fee | Potentially negotiable |
| Settlement upgrade | Potentially negotiable |
| Contract length | Potentially negotiable |
| Early termination fee | Potentially negotiable before signing |
| Reserve | Subject to underwriting rather than ordinary pricing negotiation |
Even where an underlying cost is not directly negotiable, the merchant can negotiate how the provider packages and passes it through.
Under a transparent pricing model, ask for:
This helps answer:
Which part changed because the underlying card mix changed, and which part changed because the provider changed its price?
Review costs:
Do not wait until the contract has automatically renewed.
Use at least three representative months where possible.
Collect:
A single statement can be misleading if the month was unusually busy, quiet or international.
Complete the following table:
| Cost category | Monthly amount |
|---|---|
| Interchange or blended transaction charges | |
| Scheme and processing fees | |
| Acquirer margin | |
| Fixed transaction charges | |
| Authorisations | |
| Gateway | |
| Terminal rental | |
| Monthly account fees | |
| PCI administration | |
| Refund fees | |
| Chargeback fees | |
| International-card charges | |
| Currency conversion | |
| Fraud and optional services | |
| Other recurring charges | |
| Total |
Then calculate:
Total cost ÷ card turnover × 100
Total cost ÷ successful payments
Add charges that remain even when no payments are processed.
Add the charges that change with transaction volume or value.
The PSR directed certain significant card-acquiring providers to give merchants clearer summary information and online comparison tools.
The summary box can help identify:
The PSR introduced these measures after finding that many merchants had difficulty comparing prices and that businesses with annual card turnover up to £50 million could benefit from shopping around or negotiating.
Do not rely on the summary box alone where the business has:
Use it as the starting point for the full review.
Record:
Ask whether the change relates to:
A change of 0.1% on:
£5 million annual card turnover
equals:
£5,000 per year
before fixed charges.
Do not apply the percentage only to headline turnover if different card categories have different changes.
Provide:
Review:
See the MAS guide to switching merchant account providers.
Do not assume the business can recover its card costs by adding a consumer card surcharge.
UK rules prohibit surcharges for a wide range of consumer payment methods, including many ordinary consumer card transactions. Some commercial-card and other payment situations can be treated differently, but the rules need to be checked carefully before any payment fee is imposed.
A business should not label a card surcharge as:
where the charge is, in substance, imposed because of the customer’s payment method.
Obtain legal advice where the charging model is uncertain.
Potentially.
Providers may offer:
The faster option may involve:
Compare the premium with the business’s actual working-capital need.
A next-day payout is not automatically better value if the standard settlement would not create a cash-flow problem.
Payment-related invoices do not always apply VAT to every charge in the same way.
The treatment can depend on:
Do not assume:
Check whether the quoted price is:
Use the provider’s tax invoice and obtain accounting advice where required.
The lowest rate is not automatically the best commercial result.
Consider:
A provider saving £500 per month in fees could be poor value if it causes:
The goal is not simply:
The lowest transaction percentage
It is:
The best total payment outcome for the business.
Suppose:
Effective cost:
0.8%
Headline fees are £500 lower.
But the business collected £30,000 less.
The provider with the lower fee is not necessarily producing the better commercial result.
The cause would need proper investigation before attributing the difference solely to the payment provider.
Before comparing two offers, normalise the information.
| Item | Provider A | Provider B |
|---|---|---|
| UK consumer debit | ||
| UK consumer credit | ||
| Commercial cards | ||
| International cards | ||
| Fixed transaction fee | ||
| Authorisation charge | ||
| Gateway fee | ||
| Monthly account fee | ||
| Minimum monthly charge | ||
| PCI fee | ||
| Refund fee | ||
| Chargeback fee | ||
| Terminal rental | ||
| Settlement | ||
| Reserve | ||
| Contract length | ||
| Termination cost | ||
| Integration cost | ||
| Optional services |
Then apply each offer to the same transaction data.
Do not compare:
or:
The scope of each quotation must be the same.
Tell Merchant Advice Service:
MAS can help you:
Merchant Advice Service cannot guarantee:
Final pricing, underwriting, contracts and service terms remain with the relevant payment provider.
Merchant Advice Service provides free, independent guidance to businesses looking for help with card payments, payment gateways and more complex payment requirements.
Where appropriate, MAS may introduce a business to a relevant payment provider. We may receive a referral fee or commission if an introduction results in a completed account or service.
MAS does not necessarily compare every provider in the market, and all applications remain subject to the relevant provider’s own assessment, underwriting and approval.
This article provides general payments information and does not constitute legal, regulatory, financial, tax or accounting advice. Card-processing fees, pricing models, VAT treatment, interchange, scheme charges and contractual terms vary according to the provider, transaction and merchant circumstances.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.