Merchant Cash Advance and Your Payment Processor: Do You Need to Switch?
Published - 14 August 2026
Revised - 14 August 2026


Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
No. Taking a merchant cash advance does not automatically mean you need to change your card processor.
However, merchant cash advance repayments are often linked to the sales your business processes, so your existing payment setup can form an important part of the funding arrangement.
Depending on the provider, repayments might involve:
Some merchant cash advance providers can work with numerous card processors. Others may require a particular repayment or settlement arrangement.
This means the right question is not simply:
“Will I have to change card processor?”
It is:
“How will this merchant cash advance collect repayments from my sales, and is that structure compatible with my existing payment provider?”
This should be established before accepting the finance, particularly if your business has multiple Merchant IDs, several payment channels, subscriptions, an integrated EPOS system or plans to change payment provider.
A traditional business loan will commonly have scheduled repayments that are separate from the way a business accepts customer payments.
A merchant cash advance can work differently.
The amount collected is often linked to future sales.
For example, an arrangement could provide:
If the agreed collection percentage was 15%, part of the revenue generated through the relevant sales channel would be allocated towards the outstanding advance.
Higher sales can therefore mean more money is collected during that period, while lower sales can result in a lower collection amount.
This link between sales and repayment is why the payment processor can become important.
For a detailed explanation of costs, factor rates and repayment structures, read our Merchant Cash Advance UK guide.
There is no single repayment structure used by every merchant cash advance provider.
Understanding the collection method is important because it determines how closely the finance is connected to your payment infrastructure.
Some arrangements collect a pre-agreed percentage of card sales automatically.
For example, 365 Finance currently explains that its revenue-based finance product uses an agreed percentage of credit and debit card sales, with deductions taking place automatically as transactions are processed.
The percentage used by an individual finance provider is specific to that provider and offer and should not be treated as an industry-wide rate.
View 365 Finance's current explanation of its repayment model.
Another model involves changing where the processor sends the merchant's settlement.
Instead of the payment processor sending the entire settlement directly to the merchant's normal bank account, funds can first be routed through a settlement account used within the finance arrangement.
The agreed percentage is retained and the remaining proceeds are then forwarded to the merchant.
YouLend, for example, documents a payment-routing model where merchant payouts from a processor are sent to a dedicated virtual account. YouLend retains the agreed repayment percentage and forwards the remaining funds to the merchant.
View YouLend's current payment rerouting documentation.
Merchant finance can also be embedded directly into another platform.
A merchant may be offered funding through:
The platform already has access to information about the merchant's transactions or sales and can use payment data within the funding journey.
The merchant may therefore experience the funding and payment service as part of one integrated product.
This is one reason the relationship between payments, sales data and business finance is becoming increasingly important.
Split settlement in a merchant cash advance context generally refers to a payment flow where part of the merchant's eligible sales proceeds is allocated towards the advance and the remainder is paid to the merchant.
A simplified example could look like this:
Customer payment: £100
Agreed MCA collection: 15% = £15
Remaining merchant proceeds: £85
This is a simplified illustration and does not include normal card-processing fees or other deductions that may also apply.
The actual payment flow depends on the provider.
Importantly, the finance company does not necessarily need to be your card acquirer in order for a repayment mechanism to operate.
Settlement can potentially be routed between different organisations within the payment chain.
Not always.
Some providers have established integrations or commercial arrangements with payment processors.
Others can operate repayment structures across a wider range of processors.
For example, 365 Finance currently states that its card-sales funding can operate with a number of processing providers including Lloyds Cardnet, Elavon, Worldpay, Global Payments, Barclaycard and Stripe.
View 365 Finance's current card-processor information.
YouLend's technical documentation also describes rerouting as its standard approach across payment-processing partnerships and says the model can also be used for acquiring relationships where there is no direct partnership.
View YouLend's current rerouting documentation.
This illustrates why merchants should not assume that a merchant cash advance automatically requires moving card processing.
The correct position depends on:
If a finance provider says a processor change is necessary, understand why.
Ask:
A £30,000 merchant cash advance should not be assessed separately from the payment-processing arrangement if accepting it also commits the business to a new acquiring or processing contract.
It can.
The funding cost and the payment-processing cost are technically different things, but they can become commercially connected.
Suppose a merchant currently processes £100,000 per month and receives an MCA offer that requires changing to another processor.
The merchant should compare:
A finance offer can appear attractive while a more expensive payment-processing arrangement creates an additional long-term cost.
Equally, changing processor may make commercial sense independently of the funding if the new overall payment arrangement is better suited to the business.
The two decisions should be assessed together rather than assuming either outcome.
Imagine a restaurant currently processes £50,000 per month in card payments.
It is offered a merchant cash advance and the finance provider confirms its collection mechanism is compatible with the existing processor.
The merchant may only need to authorise the required settlement or repayment arrangement.
Its:
This is significantly simpler than migrating the entire payment setup.
Whether this structure is available depends on the particular providers involved.
Now consider a merchant where the proposed finance provider cannot collect the agreed percentage through the existing payment setup.
The options might include:
This is where merchants should avoid rushing the decision simply because funding is available quickly.
If changing the payment provider also requires replacing:
the operational impact can be considerably larger than the finance application itself.
Do not simply move your card processing without checking the finance agreement first.
If MCA collections depend on sales being routed through a particular processor, Merchant ID or settlement arrangement, moving those sales elsewhere could interfere with the agreed repayment mechanism.
Before changing processor:
A processor migration and MCA repayment migration should be treated as part of the same project where the two are connected.
Potentially, depending on the agreement.
This should not be assumed either way.
Some finance structures rely on a defined settlement mechanism being maintained while money remains outstanding.
For example, YouLend's current UK payment-account terms state that its settlement account is used for receiving money from sales or card processors for the purpose of repaying financing. Its terms also state that closing that account before the outstanding financing has been repaid may trigger consequences under the financing contract.
View YouLend's current UK Payment Account Terms and Conditions.
This is one provider-specific example rather than a rule applying to every MCA.
The important lesson is to check the actual agreement before altering the payment route used to collect repayments.
This creates a different problem because the processor change may not be voluntary.
If your merchant account is suspended or terminated while an MCA remains outstanding, contact the finance provider promptly.
The business may need to establish:
Do not assume that obtaining a new merchant account automatically solves the MCA repayment issue.
The new acquiring arrangement and existing finance arrangement need to work together.
For businesses that have lost their existing facility, read our guide to terminated merchant facilities.
Merchants should answer underwriting and application questions accurately and provide requested information about existing finance, settlement arrangements and payment obligations.
An existing MCA can be relevant where it affects:
If a new acquirer needs to route settlement through a particular account to maintain an existing MCA repayment arrangement, this should be established before the new Merchant ID goes live.
This deserves particular attention.
A merchant might accept payments through:
The finance provider needs to understand which revenue forms part of the funding and repayment calculation.
For example, if an MCA was assessed using £100,000 of monthly card revenue but only £40,000 subsequently passes through the repayment route, collections may operate very differently from the original expectation.
Merchants should therefore establish:
For more information about payment structures involving several Merchant IDs, read our Multi-Merchant Accounts guide.
Merchant cash advances are not limited to businesses using traditional countertop card machines.
Current revenue-based funding products can use online and card-payment revenue when assessing and collecting finance.
The important questions for an ecommerce merchant remain the same:
A business should not switch a well-integrated ecommerce payment setup purely because it assumes an MCA requires a traditional card-machine processor.
Merchant cash advance calculations are generally linked to sales, but businesses also need to understand how their particular agreement treats:
This is especially important for businesses with significant refund volumes or delayed fulfilment.
Ask the finance provider what figure is used when calculating the collection amount:
gross sales, net settlement, or another defined measure?
The answer should be clear in the finance and payment documentation.
It can affect the merchant's cash-flow position because both arrangements can reduce the amount of each day's or week's processed revenue that becomes immediately available to the business.
For example, a merchant could potentially have:
These are separate deductions but should be modelled together when assessing available cash flow.
A business should understand how much of every £100 processed is actually expected to reach its usable bank balance.
An embedded offer can be convenient because the provider or platform may already have access to payment data and an established method for collecting repayments.
That convenience does not remove the need to compare the finance itself.
Check:
A convenient embedded offer is not automatically the cheapest or most suitable source of business finance.
Only after comparing the whole arrangement.
A processor change may be perfectly reasonable if:
It deserves more scrutiny where:
The finance provider and payment provider should solve two different business requirements:
accessing appropriate finance
and:
accepting customer payments efficiently.
One should not unnecessarily compromise the other.
Before accepting an offer, ask the provider:
“Can you show me exactly how money will move from each customer transaction through my payment processor, into the MCA repayment and finally into my business bank account?”
If the answer is not clear, ask for a payment-flow explanation.
For a card-taking business, the MCA should not be considered independently of:
customer payment → processor → acquirer → settlement → MCA collection → business cash flow.
Understanding that chain makes it much easier to compare offers and avoid discovering a payment restriction after the finance has already been accepted.
Merchant Advice Service looks at merchant cash advances from both a business-funding and payments perspective.
This is particularly useful where a business needs to understand how an advance could interact with:
MAS can help businesses understand their requirements and identify relevant merchant cash advance or payment partners where appropriate.
Our aim is not simply to find funding.
It is to help the business understand whether the funding arrangement and payment structure work together.
You can also view merchant cash advance options in the Merchant Advice Service Payments Directory®.
Merchant Advice Service is a UK business-to-business payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.
Founded in 2016, MAS helps businesses understand their payment requirements and identify payment providers or specialist partners that may be relevant to the way they operate.
We provide information and support across areas including:
Merchant Advice Service is not an acquiring bank or payment processor and does not make final underwriting decisions.
The MAS information, matching and introduction service is free to businesses. MAS may receive commission or a referral fee from some commercial partners where an introduction results in a completed product or account.
For full information about how our service operates, provider matching, independence and commercial relationships, read How Merchant Advice Service Works.
This guide was reviewed and updated in August 2026 using current information published by merchant finance providers and the Financial Conduct Authority.
YouLend publishes technical information describing sales-based repayment arrangements, including a rerouting model where processor settlement is paid into a merchant-specific virtual account before the agreed repayment percentage is retained and the remaining funds are forwarded to the merchant.
YouLend's UK terms explain the role of its settlement accounts in receiving funds from sales processors or card processors for the purpose of repaying merchant financing.
YouLend: Payment Account Terms and Conditions
365 Finance publishes information about its revenue-based repayment model, where an agreed percentage of card sales is collected automatically until the relevant balance has been repaid.
365 Finance: Merchant Cash Advance
365 Finance currently publishes examples of payment processors it can support within its card-sales funding arrangements.
365 Finance: Card Machine Funding
The FCA published a reminder in March 2026 explaining the distinction between firms registered with it solely for anti-money-laundering supervision as Annex 1 firms and businesses holding wider FCA authorisation.
FCA: Risks When Dealing With Unregulated Lenders
Merchant Advice Service is an independent payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.
Merchant cash advance and revenue-based finance structures vary between providers. Repayment methods, payment-processor compatibility, settlement requirements, pricing and contractual obligations should be confirmed directly with the relevant provider.
YouLend and 365 Finance are referenced in this guide because their current publicly available information provides useful examples of different payment and repayment structures operating in the UK market.
Inclusion does not constitute a recommendation and should not be taken to mean Merchant Advice Service can introduce businesses to every organisation referenced.
MAS may receive commission or a referral fee from some commercial partners where a business chooses to proceed following an introduction. Commercial relationships do not determine which organisations may be referenced within our independent educational content.
Providers have not paid for inclusion in this article unless explicitly stated.
Merchant finance can have legal, tax, accounting and regulatory implications depending on the structure and borrower. Businesses should read the relevant finance and payment agreements and obtain professional advice where appropriate.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.